• Martin v. United States

    Plaintiffs J.T.M. and M.B., minor grade school students, were riding home from school on a motorbike at about 6:00 P.M. on Sept. 21, 1977, when they struck a sagging or "down" power line. J.T.M. was operating the bike, and M.B. was the rear...

  • Hanna v. Plumer

    The plaintiff, a citizen of Ohio, filed her complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts to recover for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident allegedly caused by the negligence of a Massachusetts citizen...

  • Plug Into These Powerful Practical Guidance Energy Tools

    Are you faced with a transaction in the new year that you’re unsure about? If so, review our energy resource kits to get you up-to-speed on everything from labor and employment issues to mergers and acquisitions, including our Energy Real Estate...

  • Royal Globe Ins. Co. v. Superior Court

    Royal Globe Ins. Co. v. Superior Court Supreme Court of California March 29, 1979 S.F. No. 23843 Opinion  [*883]   [**331]   [***844]  Subdivision  [****2]  (h) of section 790.03 of the Insurance Code , ] a provision of the Unfair Practices Act ( Ins...

  • Larson & Larson, P.A. v. TSE Indus.

    Larson & Larson, P.A. v. TSE Indus. Supreme Court of Florida November 5, 2009, Decided No. SC08-428 Opinion  [*37]  CANADY, J. We have for review the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in TSE Industries, Inc. v. Larson & Larson, P...

  • Johnson v. Parks

    Johnson v. Parks United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit November 14, 2022, Filed No. 21-12696 Non-Argument Calendar Opinion PER CURIAM: Patricia A. Johnson appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to Walt Disney Parks...

  • Cadence Pharm., Inc. v. Exela PharmSci Inc.

    SCR Pharmatop and Cadence Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (collectively "Cadence") are the owner and exclusive licensee, respectively, of the '222 and '218 patents. These patents are directed to aqueous phenol formulations—particularly acetaminophen...

  • Pulse Network, L.L.C. v. Visa, Inc.

    Pulse Network, L.L.C. v. Visa, Inc. United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit April 5, 2022, Filed No. 18-20669 Opinion Stuart Kyle Duncan , Circuit Judge : This appeal concerns an antitrust dispute between Pulse and Visa, competitors in the...

  • Great Meadow Cafe v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.

    Great Meadow Cafe v. Cincinnati Ins. Co. United States District Court for the District of Connecticut March 17, 2022, Decided; March 17, 2022, Filed 3:21-CV-00661 (KAD) Opinion MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 23)...

  • Turyna v. Martam Constr. Co.

    The underlying lawsuit was relatively straightforward. Brad Turyna went to work for Martam Construction (Martam) as a truck driver in January 1986. He worked there until September 26, 1989, when he was fired. Almost two years later, Turyna filed this...