The horse purchaser entered into an agreement to purchase an Arabian colt named Score. The agreement, which the parties agreed would be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Arizona, provided that the purchaser would pay the sellers...

This product liability action involved a 1987 Ford Bronco II 4x2, manufactured in 1986. Defendant Cheryl Hale purchased the 1987 Ford Bronco in June of 1999. In 2001, defendant was driving her Bronco, her daughter was seated in the front passenger seat...

Petitioners H. J. Inc. et al., customers of respondent Northwestern Bell Telephone Co., filed this putative class action in the district court of Minnesota. Petitioners alleged violations of §§ 1962(a), (b), (c), and (d) by respondent telephone...

McCostis v. Home Ins. Co. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit May 2, 1994, Argued ; August 8, 1994, Decided Docket No. 93-9283 Opinion  [*111]  WALKER, Circuit Judge : Plaintiff Richard M. McCostis brought this action seeking a declaratory...

Plaintiffs Larry Semenza and Faye Fitzgerald commenced this action to recover compensation for crop damage which they allege was caused when their crops were sprayed by defendants Ronald Bowman and Eric Johnson or L & R Spraying Service. The complaint...

Cuff’s convictions and sentence relate to six incidents: (1) the June 24, 2010 armed robbery of a Cherry Hill resident in his home, where the victim was left with his hands tied behind his back and his ankles tied together; (2) the February 28,...

The trial of Esteban Martinez was set to begin on May 17, 2010. His counsel was ready; the State was not. When the court swore in the jury and invited the State to present its first witness, the State declined to present any evidence. Martinez moved for...

Plaintiffs, a driver and passenger, were injured when their car collided with a bus owned by the defendant bus company. Plaintiffs alleged that the bus driver negligently operated the bus at an unlawful speed and in a reckless manner. The defendant bus...

Appellant, Loren Martin Hatch, instituted a suit against respondents, landowner and entertainment company, arguing that both were liable for injuries stemming from failure to properly attach the bungee cord when appellant made a bungee jump. The jury...