• Welch v. Henry

    Welch v. Henry Supreme Court of the United States October 13, 1938, Argued ; November 21, 1938, Decided No. 13 Opinion  [*141]   [**123]   [***90]  MR. JUSTICE STONE delivered the opinion of the Court. This appeal presents the question whether the Act...
  • Chambless Enters., LLC v. Redfield

    Chambless Enters., LLC v. Redfield United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Monroe Division December 22, 2020, Decided; December 22, 2020, Filed CIVIL ACTION NO: 3:20-cv-01455 Opinion RULING Pending here is a Motion for Preliminary...
  • Bruni v. City of Pittsburgh

    Bruni v. City of Pittsburgh United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit February 6, 2019, Argued; October 18, 2019, Opinion Filed No. 18-1084 Opinion  [*77]  KRAUSE, Circuit Judge . This case requires us to determine the constitutionality of...
  • Hughes v. Mayoral

    Plaintiff former employee sued defendants employer and co-worker, alleging discrimination and sexual harassment/hostile work environment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and state law, as well as state law claims of intentional...
  • United States v. Duran Samaniego

    Roberto Duran, a boxer claimed that his championship belts were stolen from his house in Panama by his brother-in-law, Bolivar Iglesias. Eventually, it was found out that Duran’s championship belts came into the hands of Luis Gonzalez Baez, a Miami...
  • United States v. Carter

    On two separate days, Acme Continental Credit Union was robbed in a similar manner - the robber gained access to the area behind the teller counter through an unlocked security door separating that area from the lobby. During the second robbery, a man...
  • Shelley v. Kraemer

    The cases involved suits in state courts to enforce restrictive covenants in deeds of residential property whereby the owners agreed that the property should not be used or occupied by any person except a Caucasian. In these cases, the properties involved...
  • Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt

    In 2013, the Texas Legislature enacted House Bill 2 (H. B. 2), which contained the two provisions challenged here. The “admitting-privileges requirement” provided that a physician performing or inducing an abortion must, on the date [of service...
  • Hendershott v. People

    Defendant was charged and was conviction of assault in the third degree by the District Court of the County of Boulder (Colorado). At trial, the defendant sought to offer evidence that he had a minimal brain dysfunction in order to negate the element...
  • Vasquez v. Glassboro Serv. Asso.

    Defendant farm labor service challenged the trial court's decision in favor of plaintiff migrant farm worker in an equitable action seeking to enjoin defendant from ejecting plaintiff from communal housing that defendant provided for its farm laborers...