Nasdaq, Inc. v. IEX Grp., Inc. United States District Court for the District of New Jersey January 4, 2019, Decided; January 4, 2019, Filed Civil Action No. 18-3014-BRM-DEA Opinion Martinotti, District Judge Before this Court is Defendants IEX Group,...

Newman v. Boehm, Pearlstein & Bright, Ltd. United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit January 22, 1997, Argued ; July 2, 1997, Decided No. 96-2839, No. 96-2841 Opinion  [*479]  ROVNER, Circuit Judge . The question presented by these appeals...

Upon learning that Illinois authorities had issued an arrest warrant charging him with the sale of a substance which looked like an illegal drug, petitioner Albright surrendered to respondent Oliver, a policeman, and was released after posting bond. At...

Defendant Randall Jenkins was charged in North Carolina state court with first degree rape and second degree kidnapping. Jenkins contended that he and the complainant had an ongoing relationship and that the incident upon which the charge was based was...

After executing a will in 2002 at his attorney's office, the testator went home and told the spouse to destroy his 1995 will, which she did. Both wills named the spouse as primary beneficiary, but the 2002 will included a son as a contingent beneficiary...

Client retained law firm and attorneys to represent her with regard to allegations of corporate wrongdoing and redemption of stock in a family owned corporation. The Superior Court (District of Columbia) directed a verdict in favor of appellee firm and...

The tortfeasor was at his home when a group of youths approached the home in a vehicle. At that time, tortfeasoer was actually living in a different neighborhood with a relative and attending a different high school in the hope of avoiding gang-related...

A patient who underwent treatment for leukemia at a university medical center filed an action against his physician and others, alleging they used cells extracted from him in potentially lucrative medical research without his permission. He alleged that...

The participants filed a legal malpractice case against the law firm based on the law firm's involvement in a loan transaction. Summary judgment was granted in favor of the law firm.

Purcell v. Reading Sch. Dist. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania June 5, 2017, Argued; July 14, 2017, Decided; July 14, 2017, Filed No. 1164 C.D. 2016 Opinion  [*216]  OPINION BY JUDGE McCULLOUGH Dr. Carlinda Purcell (Purcell) appeals from a June 21,...