• State v. Gladstone

    An undercover agent asked defendant if he would sell marijuana. Defendant replied that he did not have any, but that he knew someone who sold it. Defendant provided the agent with a map and directions to the seller's residence. The agent bought marijuana...
  • Legal professional privilege...

    Hi. Does legal professional privilege apply to potential or prospective clients of a law firm or only actual, on-boarded clients?
  • How to Fundraise for Environmental Nonprofit Organizations

    The climate crisis is one of the biggest challenges facing us today. Rising CO2 levels, melting ice caps and deforestation threaten humans and wildlife. And with each passing year, the threat grows. If you’re fundraising for an environmental nonprofit...
  • Chaffin v. Braden

    Chaffin v. Braden United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Victoria Division September 26, 2016, Decided; September 26, 2016, Filed, Entered CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14-0027 Opinion MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This patent case is before the...
  • Turner v. U.S. Agency for Global Media

    Turner v. U.S. Agency for Global Media United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit May 17, 2021, Filed No. 20-5374 Opinion ORDER Upon consideration of appellants' unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal, it is ORDERED...
  • Rarick v. Federated Serv. Ins. Co.

    Rarick v. Federated Serv. Ins. Co. United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit November 2, 2016, Argued; March 28, 2017, Filed No. 15-3606 Opinion  [*225]  OPINION OF THE COURT HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge . In Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Company...
  • Duncan v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.

    The Defendants manufacture and sell or lease cars. Certain models of these cars, identified as the "Class Vehicles," contain a defective Timing Chain Tensioning System ("TCTS"). As alleged, the defect in the TCTS causes the engine...
  • Thompson v. GMAC, LLC

    Thompson v. GMAC, LLC United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit February 10, 2009, Argued; May 27, 2009, Decided No. 08-2077 Opinion  [*700]  WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge . This case involves an all too common occurrence that bankruptcy courts...
  • Lawrence v. Lawrence

    The wife argued that the antenuptial agreement was void under O.C.G.A. § 19-3-63 because it was not attested by at least two witnesses as required for every marriage contract made in contemplation of marriage. Alternatively, she claimed that the...
  • Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising Int'l, Inc.

    Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising Int'l, Inc. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit December 18, 2018, Argued and Submitted, San Francisco, California; May 2, 2019, Filed No. 17-16096 Case Summary Overview HOLDINGS: [1]-In Dynamex, a decision...