If you are a real estate investor or receive real estate income, Schedule E will play into your individual tax filings. Best practice dictates you examine the multifaceted dynamics underlying the federal taxation of rental real estate, focusing on nuances...

Top level talent remains in high demand, and many employers are seeking innovative ways to lure and retain executives. That can pose a challenge for many employers, in particular later stage start-ups, for whom stock option grants (traditionally a significant...

Episode 1: Speaking of Compliance with Lyn McMorran, Executive Director, Financial Services Federation Description: In this podcast, we sit down with Lyn McMorran, Executive Director of Financial Services Federation to discuss: What’s happening...

Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of New York March 27, 2015, Decided; March 27, 2015, Filed 12-CV-08333 (ALC)(SN) Opinion  [*588]  MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate...

United States v. Delgado United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit March 18, 2011, Submitted; September 2, 2011, Filed No. 09-3969 Opinion  [*731]  COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Juan Delgado of one count of conspiring to distribute...

2020 TTAB LEXIS 503; 2020 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 11489 Trademark Trial and Appeal Board December 10, 2020, Decided Serial No. 88105154 Opinion This Opinion Is a Precedent of the TTAB I. Background Team Jesus LLC ("Applicant") seeks to register on...

Eisner v. Macomber Supreme Court of the United States Argued April 16, 1919; restored to docket for reargument May 19, 1919; reargued October 17, 20, 1919 ; March 8, 1920 No. 318 Opinion  [*199]   [**190]   [***525]  MR. JUSTICE PITNEY delivered the opinion...

Plaintiff taxpayer was a native citizen of the United States when he took up his residence and became domiciled in the Republic of Mexico. Defendant Collector of Internal Revenue demanded that the taxpayer make a return of his income under the Revenue...

Plaintiff Native American tribes sued defendants, the State of New York and two counties, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, seeking relief for deprivation of ancestral lands. The tribes claimed that they had possessory...

The claimant, an American citizen, bought the timber before war had been declared with Great Britain. The United States seized the timber as enemy property and filed a libel for the timber's forfeiture as a prize of war. The district court dismissed...