• In re Juul Labs, Inc.

    In re Juul Labs, Inc. Judicial Panel On Multidistrict Litigation October 2, 2019, Filed MDL No. 2913 Opinion  [*1367]  TRANSFER ORDER Before the Panel : Common defendant Juul Labs, Inc. (JLI) moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize this litigation...

  • Freeman & Mills, Inc. v. Belcher Oil Co.

    An oil company retained a law firm with an understanding that the company was to pay for costs the law firm incurred on the company's behalf, including fees for accountants. The law firm hired accountants to work on the company's case. The company...

  • Fla. Hosp. Waterman, Inc. v. Buster

    The Florida Patients' Right-to-Know About Adverse Medical Incidents Act, § 381.028, Fla. Stat. (2005), implemented Amendment 7, art. X, § 25, Fla. Const. , which gave the public access to information about adverse medical incidents involving...

  • Pine Oak Builders, Inc. v. Great Am. Lloyds Ins. Co.

    Pine Oak Builders, Inc. v. Great Am. Lloyds Ins. Co. Supreme Court of Texas February 7, 2008, Argued; February 13, 2009, Opinion Delivered No. 06-0867 Opinion  [*651]  Upon being sued by five different homeowners alleging various construction defects...

  • Lead Industries Ass'n v. EPA

    Lead Industries Ass'n v. EPA United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit November 7, 1979, Argued ; June 27, 1980, Decided Nos. 78-2201, 78-2220 Opinion  [*1135]  This is the third occasion on which this court has been asked...

  • Garrett v. Coast & Southern Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn.

    Garrett v. Coast & Southern Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. Supreme Court of California July 18, 1973 L.A. No. 30107 Opinion  [*734]   [**1198]   [***846]  Plaintiffs in a class action appeal from an order of dismissal entered after the court sustained...

  • Soroka v. Dayton Hudson Corp.

    Appellant job applicants Sibi Soroka, Sue Urry and William d'Arcangelo filed a class action challenging respondent Dayton Hudson Corporation's ("Target") practice of requiring Target Store security officer applicants to pass a psychological...

  • People United for Med. Marijuana v. Fla. Dep't of Health

    The plaintiffs, which included invididual plaintiffs and an association that worked on their behalf, sought a declaratory judgment finding section 381.986, Florida Statutes (2017) inconsistent with Section 29, Article X [Amendment]. The plaintiffs also...

  • Smith v. Loanme, Inc.

    Smith v. Loanme, Inc. Supreme Court of California April 1, 2020, Opinion Filed S260391 Opinion Petition for review granted. The petition for review is granted. The requests for an order directing depublication of the opinion in the above-entitled appeal...

  • Promega Corp. v. Life Techs. Corp.

    Promega Corp. v. Life Techs. Corp. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit November 13, 2017, Decided 2013-1011, 2013-1029, 2013-1376 Opinion  [***1756]   [*653]  This case returns to us on remand from  [**2]  the Supreme Court. See Life...