Menu SIGN IN
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 4 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    In re Hilmer

    Appellants' application was filed subsequent to the Swiss filing date of Habicht but prior to the U.S. filing date of the Habicht application. The patent office, overturning an administrative interpretation of nearly 40 years standing by giving a...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Doe v. Diocese of Dallas

    Doe v. Diocese of Dallas Supreme Court of Illinois September 24, 2009, Opinion Filed Docket No. 106546 Opinion  [**477]   [*395]   [****651]  The issue in this case is whether section 13-202.2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as amended by Public Act 93...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 4 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Garber v. Harris Tr. & Sav. Bank

    Plaintiffs, Gary L. Blank and Sheldon Garber, purporting to represent a class of credit cardholders, brought the present action against defendants Harris Trust and Savings Bank (Harris Trust), Sears Roebuck and Co. (Sears), J. C. Penney Co., Inc. (Penney...
  • ellenh
    ellenh
    • over 4 years ago
    • Legal Insights Blog
    • Industry Awareness

    5 Reasons Why PPP Loan Fraud Will Be a Growth Area for Years to Come

    The short life of the Small Business Administration’s Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) has been all about speed. As the COVID-19 pandemic paralyzed the economy in March 2020, the federal government hurriedly created the PPP loan program to rescue...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Practical Guidance Journal
    • pa

    Malaysian Mobile Court Helps to Bring Undocumented People Under Rule of Law

    People living in the remote jungles of Malaysia can now claim their nationality and prove their identities through documents issued by a mobile court GAYTHRI RAMAN, MANAGING DIRECTOR OF LexisNexis Southeast Asia, and a team of magistrates, lawyers,...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 5 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Torrington Co. v. Yost

    From 1982 to 1990, defendant Mark Yost worked for plaintiff, The Torrington Company ("Torrington"), manufacturing various types of bearings. While at Torrington, Yost signed an agreement not to divulge any secret or confidential information...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 5 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Confold Pac., Inc. v. Polaris Indus.

    Defendant Polaris Industries is a manufacturer of snowmobiles and other vehicles. Polaris used to ship its vehicles in disposable containers, but in 1993 it began considering the possibility of using returnable containers instead. ConFold Pacific Inc...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 5 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    People v. Cook

    The victim, Michael Van Horn, was awakened at home in the early morning hours of Aug. 6, 1980, by loud knocking on his back door. Van Horn looked through the window and saw a man he later identified as George Billingham standing outside. Billingham stated...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 5 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Schoor v. Wilson

    Plaintiff Shirley M. Schoor had been employed by Chuck Boyles, Inc. working in various aspects of publishing and distributing a real estate advertising magazine. In June 1981, her employment was terminated and she started her own magazine, named "Town...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Practical Guidance Journal
    • pa

    Minimizing Your Company’s Exposure to a Ransomware Attack

    By: Sunil Shenoi , Erica Williams , Brian Kavanaugh , Gianni Cutri , and Lauren Casazza , Kirkland & Ellis LLP This article provides companies with key issues to consider before, during, and after a ransomware attack. Recently, there have been a...
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis