Menu SIGN IN
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Nat'l Lead Co. v. W. Lead Prods. Co.

    Nat'l Lead Co. v. W. Lead Prods. Co. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit November 13, 1963 No. 18016 Opinion  [***324]   [*540]  Since cross-appeals are involved, we will in this opinion refer to parties by the designation in the...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 2 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Barnes v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

    Plaintiff employee was diagnosed as having Bell's Palsy. Defendant employer gave employee a poor evaluation after his diagnosis, and employee was laid off. Plaintiff employee filed suit against defendant employer pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. §...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Vason v. City of Montgomery

    Vason v. City of Montgomery United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit January 29, 2001, Decided ; January 29, 2001, Filed No. 00-11544. Opinion  [*905]  PER CURIAM: Appellant Jo Ann Vason filed suit against the City of Montgomery (the City...
  • Sherica Celine
    Sherica Celine
    • over 3 years ago
    • Legal Insights Blog
    • Practical Guidance

    Online Shopping? Personal Email? No Privacy in Work-Related Communications

    Companies need effective policies to ensure that employees understand the proper use of work-related electronic communications and that they have no privacy in those communications. Use these drafting tips on work-related communications systems, email...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 4 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    B & W Glass v. Weather Shield Mfg.

    B & W Glass, Inc. (B & W) was a Wyoming corporation selling and installing windows in both commercial and residential buildings. The principals in B & W were three brothers, Larry, Tom, and Doug Ludtke. Sometime during the first three months...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 4 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    McPeek v. McCardle

    As a result of her first husband's death, Edwina VanTyle became the sole owner of the family farm located in Ohio County and Switzerland County, Indiana. On June 30, 1994, armed with a marriage license obtained from the clerk of the circuit court...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 4 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Dunn v. Blumstein

    Appellee James Blumstein moved to Tennessee on June 12, 1970. With an eye toward voting in the upcoming August and November elections, he attempted to register to vote on July 1, 1970; however, the county registrar refuse to register him, on the ground...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Moore v. Schering Plough, Inc.

    Moore v. Schering Plough, Inc. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division January 12, 2000, Argued ; February 7, 2000, Decided DOCKET NO. A-1642-98T3 Opinion  [*302]   [**2]  The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D. This is an appeal...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Practical Guidance Journal
    • pa

    Main Street Lending Program: Key Practice Points

    By: Michael Chernick , Tomasz Kulawik , Mohamed El-Sayed , and Lisseth A. Rincon Manzano , Shearman & Sterling LLP This article describes the terms of the facilities available under the Main Street Lending Program, in addition to providing practice...
  • AKP
    AKP
    • over 5 years ago
    • LexTalk® UK
    • LexTalk® PI & Clinical Negligance

    Stage 3 Hearings

    It is my understanding that at Stage 3 Oral Hearings (adult cases) only submissions are made by Counsel and there is no need for C to attend as there is no cross examination given that Part 8B is a simplified process. Is this correct? Thanks.
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis