• Homami v. Iranzadi

    Homami and Iranzadi were brothers-in-law. At the time of this transaction, they had been involved in various business dealings together both in Iran and in the United States. On January 9, 1984, Homami wrote a check for $ 250,000 to California Land Title...
  • Gonzales v. San Gabriel Transit, Inc.

    Gonzales v. San Gabriel Transit, Inc. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, Division Four October 8, 2019, Opinion Filed B282377 Opinion  [**687]  WILLHITE, Acting P. J. —Appellant Francisco Gonzales formerly worked as a driver for...
  • State Indus. v. A.O. Smith Corp.

    State Indus. v. A.O. Smith Corp. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit January 3, 1985 No. 84-590 Opinion  [***419]   [*1227]  RICH, Circuit Judge. This appeal is from the October 5, 1983, Order of the United States District Court for...
  • Florida v. Bostick

    As part of a drug interdiction effort, Broward County Sheriff's Department officers routinely board buses at scheduled stops and ask passengers for permission to search their luggage. Two officers boarded respondent Bostick's bus and, without...
  • Sebastian v. Floyd

    Jean Sebastian, contracted on November 8, 1974, to buy a house and lot situated in Covington, Kentucky, from Perl and Zona Floyd. Sebastian paid $3,800.00 down and was to pay the balance of the $10,900.00 purchase price, plus taxes, insurance, and interest...
  • Barrie Sch. v. Patch

    Respondents, Andrew and Pamela Patch, are parents who enrolled their daughter, Christiana, in The Barrie School for the 2004-2005 academic year. The Patch's entered into a re-enrollment agreement (the "Agreement") with The Barrie School...
  • United States v. Gentry

    Kevin Mark Gentry is no extortionist, but he made a false report of food tampering. On May 2, 1989, he told fellow employees -- plus the security force of the mall where he worked -- that he had bit into a pin when he ate M&M candy bought from a vending...
  • Valdez v. Terminix Int'l Co. Ltd. P’ship

    Valdez v. Terminix Int'l Co. Ltd. P’ship United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit February 16, 2017, Submitted, Pasadena, California 1 ; March 3, 2017, Filed No. 15-56236 Opinion  [*593]  MEMORANDUM 3 Defendant-Appellant Terminix International...
  • Orrisch v. Commissioner

    Under their 1963 partnership agreement, partners A and B were to share equally the gains and losses from the operation of two apartment houses as well as the proceeds of the sale thereof. In a 1966 amendment to the partnership agreement, the partners...
  • Spurlin v. Gen. Motors Corp.

    Two wrongful death suits and twenty-two personal injury actions were filed by plaintiff surviving parents, on behalf of the children who were in the bus at the time, against the manufacturer of the school bus chassis, General Motors Corporation, when...