Menu SIGN IN
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Daimler AG v. Bauman

    Daimler AG v. Bauman Supreme Court of the United States October 15, 2013, Argued; January 14, 2014, Decided No. 11-965 Opinion  [*120]  Justice Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court. This case concerns the authority of a court in the United States...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    A.H. v. Evenflo Co.

    A.H. v. Evenflo Co. United States District Court for the District of Colorado May 31, 2012, Decided; May 31, 2012, Filed Civil Action No. 10-cv-02435-RBJ-KMT Opinion AMENDED ORDER This matter is before the court on "Plaintiffs' Motion Requesting...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    United States v. Messner

    United States v. Messner United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit February 19, 1997, Filed No. 96-3146 Opinion  [*1451]  PORFILIO , Circuit Judge. Defendant Ronald Roe Messner appeals his five-count conviction on a superseding indictment charging...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 5 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    United States v. Arch Trading Co.

    Arch Trading Company, Inc. (“Arch Trading”) was indicted after government agents discovered that Arch Trading's executives violated two emergency executive orders prohibiting doing business with Iraq by their attempt to enter Iraq to install...
  • Ruth
    Ruth
    • over 5 years ago
    • LexTalk® UK
    • LexTalk® Planning

    Is a court yard's cobbled surface within the curtilage of a grade 1 listed building an "object or structure"?

    Can anyone assist with the above question?
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Otero v. Pacheco

    Defendant neighbors built two homes on the lots, which were served by one sewer line. The plaintiff property owners, who purchased the second home, brought the action to recover amounts paid in ad valorem taxes. The trial court found in favor of the neighbors...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 2 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Verneuille v. Verneuille

    Plaintiff husband filed an action en desaveu and for nullity of marriage, and, in the alternative, for separation a mensa et thoro, against defendant wife. The husband alleged that at the time of his marriage to the wife that she was pregnant with a child...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 2 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. Handy

    Plaintiff The Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Salisbury, Maryland, was a Maryland corporation that bottles soft-drink beverages. Plaintiff’s principal place of business was in Salisbury, Maryland. There were five named defendants; Handy Realty, Inc...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    United States v. Guillory

    United States v. Guillory United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana May 10, 2022, Decided; May 10, 2022, Filed CRIMINAL ACTION NO: 21-18 SECTION: "S" Opinion ORDER AND REASONS IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's...
  • Sherica Celine
    Sherica Celine
    • over 3 years ago
    • Legal Insights Blog
    • Practical Guidance

    Monopoly Power Risk Factors

    While having a monopoly is not itself an antitrust violation, companies with monopoly power can violate antitrust laws by engaging in business activities that might otherwise be legal for a company without monopoly power. Our Monopoly Power Antitrust...
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis