Menu SIGN IN
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Wangs Alliance Corp.

    Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Wangs Alliance Corp. United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts December 11, 2017, Decided; December 11, 2017, Filed Civil Action No. 14-12298-DJC Opinion MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CASPER, J. I. Introduction...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Genesco, Inc. v. Finish Line

    Genesco, Inc. v. Finish Line Chancery Court for the State of Tennessee, Twentieth Judicial District, Davidson County December 27, 2007, Filed NO. 07-2137-II(III) Opinion MEMORANDUM AND ORDER On June 17, 2007, the parties to this lawsuit, both sellers...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Frontier Oil Corp. v. Holly Corp.

    Frontier Oil Corp. v. Holly Corp. Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle May 4, 2004, Submitted ; April 29, 2005, Decided C.A. No. 20502 Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Frontier Oil Corporation ("Frontier"...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Ex parte Young

    Ex parte Young Supreme Court of the United States December 2, 3, 1907, Argued ; March 23, 1908 No. 10, Original Opinion  [*142]   [**446]  MR. JUSTICE PECKHAM, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. We recognize and...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Dodocase VR, Inc. v. MerchSource, LLC

    Dodocase VR, Inc. v. MerchSource, LLC United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit April 18, 2019, Decided 2018-1724 Opinion  [*932]  Prost , Chief Judge . MerchSource, LLC ("MerchSource") appeals the United States District Court for...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Bardy Diagnostics, Inc. v. Hill-Rom, Inc.

    Bardy Diagnostics, Inc. v. Hill-Rom, Inc. Court of Chancery of Delaware June 4, 2021, Submitted; July 9, 2021, Decided C.A. No. 2021-0175-JRS Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION SLIGHTS, Vice Chancellor Hill-Rom, Inc. ("Hillrom") and its merger subsidiary...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Am. Needle, Inc. v. NFL

    Am. Needle, Inc. v. NFL Supreme Court of the United States January 13, 2010, Argued; May 24, 2010, Decided No. 08-661 Opinion  [*186]   [***955]   [**2206]  Justice Stevens delivered the opinion of the Court. “Every contract, combination in the form of...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    25 I. & N. Dec. 378; 2010 BIA LEXIS 35

    25 I. & N. Dec. 378; 2010 BIA LEXIS 35 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office For Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals November 17, 2010, Decided 3701 Opinion  [*378]  COLE, Board Member: In a decision dated August 19, 2009, an Immigration...
  • Sherica Celine
    Sherica Celine
    • over 3 years ago
    • Legal Insights Blog
    • Practical Guidance

    Fringe Benefits Aren’t Always “Free” Benefits

    Fringe benefits and their tax treatment by prominent executives and others has been highlighted in the current news cycle. Many have pointed to the ambiguity of the term “fringe” and the complicated tax rules to defend their positions on everything...
  • Sherica Celine
    Sherica Celine
    • over 3 years ago
    • Legal Insights Blog
    • Practical Guidance

    Why Zoom Depositions Are Likely Inadmissible

    With remote depositions having become the norm during the pandemic, some attorneys have assumed that Zoom depositions are admissible in court. Learn why they might be very wrong. READ NOW » Related Content Notice of Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition...
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis