• Professionals & Patients for Customized Care v. Shalala

    Appellant, Professionals and Patients for Customized Care, filed suit claiming that appellee Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Compliance Policy Guide (CPG) 7132.16 was invalid because it was a substantive rule issued in violation of the notice...
  • Infrastructure Act Imposes New Crypto Reporting Requirements

    While the primary goal of the recently passed Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Pub. L. No. 117-58 (Infrastructure Act), is to upgrade and improve the nation’s infrastructure, the Infrastructure Act also aims to improve the collection of taxes...
  • Swanson v. Marin Mun. Water Dist.

    Defendant Marin Municipal Water District adopted a resolution, finding that water consumption was outpacing water capacity in the district, and declared a water shortage emergency. Plaintiff Albert Swanson, who had already obtained approval of his plans...
  • Kazatsky v. King David Mem'l Park

    Appellants Harvey and Marsha Kazatsky, husband and wife, sought to recover for intentional infliction of emotional distress caused by the cemetery company's failure to care for the gravesites of appellants' deceased infants and by the company's...
  • CompuServe, Inc. v. Patterson

    Defendant Richard Patterson marketed his product over the Internet through CompuServe. Patterson later accused CompuServe of trademark infringement, and demanded money from CompuServe to settle the matter. CompuServe sued in Ohio district court for declaratory...
  • Wortmann v. French

    The ex-husband was living with a mistress part of the time. He desired to obtain a quick divorce from the ex-wife and marry the mistress. He therefore transferred their home and furniture to the ex-wife for $ 10. The district court annulled the sale on...
  • Sher v. Raytheon Co.

    Sher v. Raytheon Co. United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit March 9, 2011, Decided; March 9, 2011, Filed No. 09-15798 Opinion  [*888]  HILL, Circuit Judge: In this case alleging environmental contamination, defendant Raytheon Company...
  • R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Kaplan

    R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Kaplan Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District June 23, 2021, Decided No. 4D18-2880 Opinion Conner , J. We deny the appellants' motion for rehearing en banc, but grant appellants' motion for a revised written opinion...
  • Prantil v. Arkema Inc.

    Prantil v. Arkema Inc. United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit January 22, 2021, Filed No. 19-20723 Opinion  [*573]  Patrick E. Higginbotham , Circuit Judge : As Hurricane Harvey deluged southeastern Texas with  [**2]  record floods, volatile...
  • Malriat v. Quantumscape Corp.

    Malriat v. Quantumscape Corp. United States District Court for the Northern District of California April 20, 2021, Decided; April 20, 2021, Filed Case No. 3:21-cv-00058-WHO; Case No. 3:21-cv-00070-WHO; Case No. 3:21-cv-00150-WHO Opinion ORDER CONSOLIDATING...