United States v. Haney United States District Court for the Southern District of New York April 13, 2020, Decided 19-cr-541 (JSR) Opinion OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J. Defendant Hugh Haney, who has yet to serve 33 months of his 42 months'...

United States v. Dominguez United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit October 31, 2011, Decided; October 31, 2011, Filed No. 07-13405 Opinion  [*1056]  COX, Circuit Judge: Gustavo Dominguez, a professional sports agent, was convicted of smuggling...

Micron Tech., Inc. v. United Microelectronics Corp. United States District Court for the Northern District of California November 20, 2018, Decided; November 20, 2018, Filed Case No. 17-cv-06932-MMC Opinion ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SERVE...

Meemic Ins. Co. v. Vertical Partners W., LLC United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division October 6, 2019, Decided; October 6, 2019, Filed Case No. 18-cv-11603 Opinion OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S...

Graciano v. Robinson Ford Sales, Inc. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One October 26, 2006, Filed D047369 Opinion  [**277]  O'ROURKE, J. —Plaintiff Alba Graciano appeals from an order awarding her attorney fees following...

In re Quinlan Supreme Court of New Jersey January 26, 1976, Argued ; March 31, 1976, Decided No Number in Original Case Summary Procedural Posture Appellant, father of an incompetent, sought review of an order from the Superior Court (New Jersey), which...

Two state prisoners, Powell and Rice, both convicted of homicide, one in a California and the other in a Nebraska state court, sought federal habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254 on the ground that at the respective state trials evidence...

Respondent former employee worked as a wholesale food salesperson in Missouri and wanted to move back to Wisconsin. After meetings with appellant company, an agreement evolved whereby the employee would receive a base salary plus commission. He also was...

The attorney admitted that he had violated Ky. Sup. Ct. R. 3.130, 8.1(b), because the attorney had been charged with driving under the influence, first offense, in violation of Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 189A.010, after he had taken the bar examination...

Respondent minority stockholders brought an action against petitioner president/director of a corporation for fraud and abuse of his controlling position. Respondents sought for the accounting of all properties, money and assets be carried out through...