• BY Dev., Inc. v. United Fire & Cas. Co.

    BY Dev., Inc. v. United Fire & Cas. Co. United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, Western Division March 14, 2006, Decided ; March 14, 2006, Filed CIV. 04-5116 Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is a...
  • Kaufman v. Stephen Cahen

    In 1980, the doctor treating plaintiff Arlene Kaufman's husband allegedly misdiagnosed a cancerous mole on Mr. Kaufman’s foot. Three years later, Mr. Kaufman died of cancer. In 1983, Kaufman retained defendants Steven Cahen, P.A. ("Firm"...
  • Bauman v. Crawford

    Plaintiff D.T.B., a minor, was injured when the bicycle on which he was riding collided with an automobile that was being driven by defendant Robert S. Crawford. D.T.B. by his guardian ad litem, John H. Chapman, and Lydia Bauman, filed a lawsuit against...
  • Garcia v. San Antonio Metro. Transit Auth.

    The San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority (SAMTA), a public mass-transit authority that is the major provider of transportation in the San Antonio, Texas, metropolitan area, filed an action in the United States District Court seeking a declaratory...
  • Banks v. Fritsch

    Appellant high school student frequently missed appellee's agriculture wood construction class. One class period, appellee teacher chained appellant to a tree in the area where students were painting feed troughs. After 25 -30 minutes and a discussion...
  • L.S. ex rel. Hernandez v. Peterson

    The students sued Broward County and five public officials on the theory that their response to the school shooting was so incompetent that it violated the students' substantive rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the...
  • Mathews v. Eldridge

    Mathews v. Eldridge Supreme Court of the United States Argued October 6, 1975 ; February 24, 1976 No. 74-204. Opinion  [*323]   [***26]   [**897]  MR. JUSTICE POWELL delivered the opinion of the Court. The issue in this case is whether the Due Process...
  • Is a Non-Molestation Order obtained in England & Wales enforceable in Scotland?

    The applicant has obtained a Non-Molestation Order in England and Wales when both parties lived in the jurisdiction. She has now obtained temporary accommodation in Scotland and has confirmed that she wishes to say there. The Respondent remains in England...
  • Hsin Ten Enter. United States v. Clark Enters.

    Hsin Ten Enter. United States v. Clark Enters. United States District Court for the Southern District of New York December 28, 2000, Decided ; December 29, 2000, Filed 00 CIV. 5878 (SAS) Opinion  [*451]  OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, U.S.D.J...
  • In re U.K.

    In re U.K. United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division November 1, 2007, Decided; November 5, 2007, Filed Case No. 3:07-mc-46-J-32MCR Opinion ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the United States of America's...