• Pulley v. Milberger

    The tenants argued that the landlord failed to plead the absence of bad faith, that the items charged against the deposit were reasonable under Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 92.109 (1995), and that he had a reasonable excuse for failing to either refund...
  • S. Utah Wilderness All. v. BLM

    The groups filed suit against the counties and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), alleging that the counties engaged in unlawful road construction activities and that the BLM violated its duties by not taking action. The district court referred the...
  • New: Practical Guidance Federal Government Practice Area

    Practical Guidance’s new comprehensive Federal Government practice area consolidates all relevant information into one place for ease of use and intuitive navigation. It provides practitioners with guidance on Federal Government contracting, agency...
  • FTC v. Arch Coal, Inc.

    In consolidated cases, plaintiffs, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and several States, filed motions for a preliminary injunction against a merger proposed by defendant companies. The merger involved the acquisition of one of the companies and its...
  • Letters of Administration with minority interest

    Hi, I have a case whereby the father has died with two children, one is 18 and Autistic and the other is a minor at 15. The father was divorced. The uncle would like to act as Administrator, even though the mother of the children (the ex-wife) is alive...
  • Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Moda

    Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Moda Superior Court of Connecticut, Complex Litigation Docket At Waterbury June 15, 2021, Decided DOC. NO.: X06-UWY-CV-20-6056095-S Opinion MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT #142 FACTS In this matter, the...
  • Dotson v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc.

    Dotson v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc. United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma February 4, 2019, Decided; February 4, 2019, Filed Case No. CIV-17-575-D Opinion ORDER Several motions are pending before the Court. 1 The motions...
  • Lacoste v. Guidroz

    Plaintiff Honore Lacoste’s counsel contended that the exclusion of the testimony "was a misapplication of the Article 2281, which contemplated an existing, undisputed marriage, during which, on grounds of public policy, the spouses are not...
  • United States v. Constantine

    In November, 1934, an information was filed in the District Court for Northern Alabama charging that on October 8, 1934, at Birmingham, Alabama, the respondent conducted the business of a retail dealer in malt liquor, contrary to the laws of the State...
  • McNabb v. United States

    McNabb v. United States Supreme Court of the United States October 22, 1942, Argued ; March 1, 1943, Decided No. 25 Opinion  [*333]   [**609]   [***820]  MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court. The petitioners are under sentence of...