Plaintiff landowners Cora Abadie and Zadie Montgomery and defendant neighbors Rebecca J. Bolton and Randolph R. Cassidy et al., owned adjoining lots. Each lot was burdened by a five-foot drainage servitude. Plaintiffs, alleging that defendants were obstructing...

Koppi v. Palmieri Tyler Wiener Wilhelm & Waldron Llp Superior Court of California, County of Orange February 24, 2022, Decided; February 24, 2022, Filed 30-2021 -01215820-CU-PN-CXC Opinion MINUTE ORDER APPEARANCES Kathrynn Benson, from SIDDIQUI LAW...

Borel v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana February 24, 2010, Decided; February 24, 2010, Filed CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-2799 SECTION "F" (3) Opinion  [*276]  ORDER SETTING ORAL HEARING On this...

D'Agostino v. Baker United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit February 5, 2016, Decided No. 15-1433 Opinion  [*242]  SOUTER, Associate Justice . As relevant here, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 15D, § 17(b) provides that family child care providers...

Appellant police officer was called to the bar owners' facility after an intoxicated patron refused to leave the bar. The officer, when arresting the patron, was injured. He brought a dramshop action under Iowa Code § 123.92 (1985) against the...

Hoagland v. Sandberg, Phoenix & Von Gontard, P.C. United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit December 11, 2003, Argued ; September 22, 2004, Decided No. 03-2059 Opinion  [*738]  POSNER, Circuit Judge . Donald Hoagland, as receiver for...

Plaintiff James Kyle Coleman volunteered to assist in coaching a team of young soccer players in a program of defendant Soccer Association of Columbia ("SAC"). While at field not owned by SAC, Coleman kicked a soccer ball into a soccer goal...

Plaintiff shareholders initiated an action, individually and derivatively, against defendant corporate board directors, seeking to invalidate the adoption of a preferred stock rights dividend plan. The action was made on the basis that the plan abridged...

In 1880, the elected officials of the city of San Francisco passed an ordinance making it illegal to operate a laundry in a wooden building without a permit from the Board of Supervisors. The ordinance conferred upon the Board of Supervisors the discretion...

Respondent, a Texas partnership, obtained a judgment against petitioner, a Mexican corporation, but the action was subsequently dismissed upon a finding that the partnership included Mexican citizens as partners, thus precluding diversity jurisdiction...