Menu SIGN IN
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Artis v. District of Columbia

    Artis v. District of Columbia Supreme Court of the United States November 1, 2017, Argued; January 22, 2018, Decided No. 16-460. Opinion Justice Ginsburg  [***6]  delivered the opinion of the Court. The Supplemental Jurisdiction statute, 28 U. S. C. ...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    American States Ins. Co. v. Kiger

    American States Ins. Co. v. Kiger Supreme Court of Indiana March 27, 1996, Filed Supreme Court No. 32S05-9409-CV-836 Opinion  [*946]  ON EMERGENCY PETITION TO TRANSFER DeBRULER, Justice. This case comes before the Court on emergency petition to transfer...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    AMERICAN INCOME INS. CO. v. KINDLESPARKER

    AMERICAN INCOME INS. CO. v. KINDLESPARKER Court of Appeals of Indiana March 9, 1936, Filed No. 15,181. Opinion  [*446]   [**433]  WOOD, J.--Appellee brought suit against the appellant to recover money alleged to be due and owing under an indemnity disability...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    American Economy Ins. Co. v State of New York

    American Economy Ins. Co. v State of New York Court of Appeals of New York September 7, 2017, Argued; October 24, 2017, Decided No. 96 Opinion  [**129]   [*140]   [***97]  Fahey, J. Workers' compensation insurance is a heavily regulated area of the...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Aerojet-General Corp. v. Transport Indemnity Co.

    Aerojet-General Corp. v. Transport Indemnity Co. Supreme Court of California December 29, 1997, Decided No. S054501. Opinion  [*45]   [**912]   [***121]  MOSK, J. In this cause, we resolve two issues relating to standard commercial general liability insurance...
  • beng
    beng
    • over 5 years ago
    • Insights
    • Blog

    Covid-19 Responses and Administration of the Rule of Law

    By Ian McDougall, LexisNexis In my previous blog I described what I called a “warning from history.” In times of crisis, emergency measures must be taken. Nobody seriously disputes that. Sometimes extreme measures have to be taken that,...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 5 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Patterson v. Illinois

    Defendant Tyrone Patterson, a gang member, was accused of participating in a murder. After he was indicted, and while he was in custody, Patterson started to make a statement about the murder to a police officer. The officer interrupted him and handed...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 5 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    United States v. Lopez

    Defendant Ronald McIntosh disappeared on October 28, 1986, during an unescorted transfer from F.C.I. Pleasanton to the federal prison at Lompoc. He landed a helicopter in the Pleasanton recreation yard on November 5, 1986, and flew off with defendant...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 5 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Route 6 Outparcels, LLC v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc.

    Pursuant to a 2006 ground lease agreement, defendant Ruby Tuesday, Inc. agreed to construct and open a restaurant on real property owned by plaintiff Route 6 Parcels, LLC by March 2009. The real property was located in Pennsylvania, and Ruby Tuesday agreed...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 5 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Bartush-Schnitzius Foods Co. v. Cimco Refrigeration, Inc.

    In 2010, Bartush-Schnitzius Foods Co. (Bartush) contracted with Cimco Refrigeration, Inc. to install a new refrigeration system for its production facilities, which required a constant temperature no higher than thirty-eight degrees. Cimco sent Bartush...
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis