NASA v. Nelson Supreme Court of the United States October 5, 2010, Argued; January 19, 2011, Decided No. 09-530 Opinion  [*138]   [***673]  Justice Alito delivered the opinion of the Court. In two cases decided more than 30 years ago, this Court referred...

Defendant Cletus McLaughlin was driving his father’s automobile about half past ten in the evening along Northampton Street in Wilkes-Barre Township in the County of Luzerne, progressing down grade at the rate of twenty or twenty-five miles per...

Defendant Shellee Hale posted comments regarding the criminal activity within the adult entertainment industry on other sites’ message boards. One of the message boards, Oprano, provided an online platform for people to post unfiltered comments...

Nat'l Ink & Stitch, LLC v. State Auto Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. United States District Court for the District of Maryland January 23, 2020, Decided; January 23, 2020, Filed Civil Case No. SAG-18-2138 Opinion  [*680]  MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff...

This is a suit for an infringement of a patent for an alleged new and useful improvement in the preparation of leather, and is similar in its general features to the suit of the complainant against Dodge, 93 U.S. 460 . It is submitted upon substantially...

During an emergency medical procedure on a patient, the doctor struck the nurse on the forearm and demanded that she turn on the suction. No physical injury of any kind resulted from this striking. The jury awarded $ 10,000 in punitive damages and $ 1...

A regional planning agency imposed the temporary moratoria to maintain the status quo while studying the impact of development near a popular resort lake and designing an environmentally sound growth strategy.The landowners living near a pristine lake...

Defendant was involved in a drag race. The other participant died after he was thrown from his car when it crashed into a guardrail. Defendant was charged with the crime of vehicular homicide. After the trial court denied defendant's motion to dismiss...

Appellants, husband and wife, sought review of the judgment which reversed a ruling that had granted the husband and wife the right to appeal in forma pauperis in an action filed against appellee corporation.

Believing that Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 16-917(A) impermissibly burdened its right to speak and educate the public about certain candidates, plaintiff political action committee (PAC) filed an action challenging the constitutionality of the statute.