Menu SIGN IN
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Lockheed Martin Corp. v. United States

    Lockheed Martin Corp. v. United States United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit April 26, 2000, Decided 99-5039 Opinion  [*1368]  LOURIE, Circuit Judge . Lockheed Martin Corporation appeals from the decisions of the United States Court of...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    State v. Moore

    State v. Moore Superior Court of Connecticut, Judicial District of Hartford At Hartford April 22, 2003, Decided ; June 2, 2003, Filed CR98521508 Opinion MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The petitioner was sentenced after a jury trial on Assault in the first degree...
  • MATTHEW WATERFIELD
    MATTHEW WATERFIELD
    • over 4 years ago
    • LexTalk® UK
    • LexTalk® PI & Clinical Negligance

    Witness Statement exchange following an adjourned hearing for application to extend time.

    I have an EL Multi Track Claim where the Def has made an application to amend their Defence. The CL has made a Part 18 Request for Information. I act for the CL. The CL has not consented to the Amendments and an application was to be heard at the Court...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Amchem Prods. v. Windsor

    As a result of extensive negotiations between counsel representing persons exposed to asbestos products and counsel representing a group of 20 former asbestos product manufacturers, an agreement was reached in an attempt to resolve present and future...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    People v. Bland

    In a prosecution of a gang member for the murder of a rival gang member whom defendant shot while the victim was in a car with two non-gang members, who were also shot but not killed, the trial court instructed the jury on the doctrine of transferred...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Lamkins v. Int'l Harvester Co.

    The farmer bought a tractor. He later signed a note for the tractor on the express promise that the dealer shall supply the lights and starter for the tractor. The note was indorsed and negotiated to the company. In the company's suit on the note...
  • lexisassociatesauthor
    lexisassociatesauthor
    • over 7 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Lexis Associates

    Bates v. C & S Adjusters, Inc.

    A debt collector mailed collection letter to a debtor's old address. The post office forwarded the letter to debtor's new address, which was in a different judicial district. The debtor sued alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices...
  • lexisassociatesauthor
    lexisassociatesauthor
    • over 7 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Lexis Associates

    Ploof v. Putnam

    Defendant was the owner of a dock attached to an island. Plaintiff was sailing in a loaded sloop with his wife and children. A storm arose and plaintiff moored the sloop to defendant's dock to avoid danger to their lives and to their property. Defendant's...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Eagle Force Holdings, LLC v. Campbell

    Eagle Force Holdings, LLC v. Campbell Supreme Court of Delaware March 7, 2018, Submitted; May 24, 2018, Decided No. 399, 2017 Opinion  [*1212]  VALIHURA , Justice, for the Majority: One of the first things first-year law students learn in their basic...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 2 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Merritt Hill Vineyards, Inc. v. Windy Heights Vineyard, Inc.

    Plaintiff buyer entered into a written agreement with the seller to purchase a majority stock interest in a vineyard. At the closing, the buyer discovered that a title insurance policy that was required to be obtained by the seller under the parties'...
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis