• Burnside v. Byars

    Students began wearing and distributing "freedom buttons" at a school. Defendants, officials of the Booker T. Washington High School of Philadelphia, Mississippi, implemented a regulation that banned the wearing and distribution of the buttons...
  • Big Cat Rescue Corp. v. Big Cat Rescue Entm't Grp., Inc.

    This is a lawsuit for copyright infringement of a photograph. The photograph was taken on April 25, 2010, by Julie Hanan, who assigned ownership to Plaintiff Big Cat Rescue Corporation (Big Cat). Big Cat registered the photograph and holds a valid copyright...
  • A Paralegal’s Guide to AI and Automation

    One might look at the rapid evolution of legal technology and think that the days of the traditional paralegal are numbered. However, as most law firms would likely tell you, this simply is not true. Though some of the tasks that they’ve handled...
  • SDLT MIXED USE

    property comprises- a)ground floor shop subject to long lease to Buyers at peppercorn rent b)1st floor flat. Buyers now buying freehold. there is no value (and only liability) in being Landlord of shop (merger seems irrelevant to Q) price paid...
  • Pivot Point Int'l, Inc. v. Charlene Prods.

    Plaintiff brought a copyright infringement suit against defendant after it produced a mannequin that was very close in appearance to its mannequin. Plaintiff developed and marketed educational techniques and tools for the hair design industry. One aspect...
  • Omni USA, Inc. v. Parker-Hannifin Corp.

    Plaintiff filed an action against defendant Parker, alleging that the latter sold improperly designed, manufactured, marketed, and serviced defective industrial oil seals specifically for use in its gearboxes, sold as part of agricultural irrigation systems...
  • Stanley J. How & Assocs., Inc. v. Boss

    Plaintiff architect brought suit against defendant promoter to recover the balance of an unpaid fee for performance of architectural services for preparation and completion of specifications and general working drawings. The architect claimed damages...
  • Whitacre v. Crowe

    Decedent Kay Whitacre had five adult children at the time of her death. Her will was admitted to probate. Her daughter Victoria, was named as the sole beneficiary, while her son, Michael, was named as executor. Kay's three remaining children, Shawn...
  • Reeves Bros. v. United States Laminating Corp.

    This action involves two inventions made by John W. Dickey, the first in March, 1956 and the second in May, 1957, upon which three patents were issued and duly assigned to Reeves Brothers, Inc. The First Patent relates to lamination of polyurethane foam...
  • Robinson v. Meadows

    Plaintiff filed an action against defendant dog owner to recover damages for her injuries based on § 16 of the Animal Control Act. Plaintiff accompanied her mother when her mother paid a social call to the dog owner's home. Plaintiff was attacked...
< >