Menu SIGN IN
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Gallo v. Travelers Prop. Cas.

    Gallo v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Department September 30, 2005, Decided; September 30, 2005, Entered CA 04-03008 Opinion  [*1379]   [**850]  Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Donna...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Carvalho v. Equifax Info. Servs., LLC

    Carvalho v. Equifax Info. Servs., LLC United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit February 11, 2010, Argued and Submitted, San Francisco, California; December 16, 2010, Amended No. 09-15030 Opinion  [*881]  AMENDED OPINION O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 3 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Viacom Int'l, Inc. v. Kearney

    Plaintiff-appellant Viacom International, Inc. brought the present diversity action in federal court against defendant-appellee Michael W. Kearney seeking indemnification for costs arising from the environmental cleanup of the facilities at Taylor Forge...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 3 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    St. Louis Union Tr. Co. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

    Defendants were a corporation and its officers. Plaintiffs were the executors for the estate of a former officer and a shareholder of defendant corporation. After the former officer died, the corporation exercised its option to purchase stock owned by...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    United States v. Waldrip

    United States v. Waldrip United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit April 4, 2017, Argued; June 12, 2017, Decided No. 16-2294 Opinion  [*447]  Kanne , Circuit Judge . A jury convicted Steven Waldrip of distributing heroin under the Controlled...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 3 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Bernstein v. Virgin Am., Inc.

    Bernstein v. Virgin Am., Inc. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit January 14, 2021, Argued and Submitted; July 20, 2021, Amended Nos. 19-15382, 20-15186 Opinion  [*1133]  AMENDED OPINION M. SMITH, Circuit Judge: This case requires us...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    United States v. AMR Corp.

    United States v. AMR Corp. United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit July 3, 2003, Filed No. 01-3202 Opinion  [*1111]  LUCERO , Circuit Judge. This case involves the nature of permissible competitive practices in the airline industry under...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 4 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Iler Grp., Inc. v. Discrete Wireless, Inc.

    On or about, July 11, 2006, Plaintiff Iler Group Inc., doing business as Fleetistics, and Defendant Discrete Wireless, Inc., doing business as Nextraq, entered into a Dealer Agreement for the purchase of GPS tracking devices, resale of those devices,...
  • CorporateSol
    CorporateSol
    • over 4 years ago
    • LexTalk® UK
    • LexTalk® Commercial

    Company Valuation - Discount for Minority Shareholding - Marital Breakdown/Divorce

    Please refer me to some guidance for the forensic accountant valuing company shares (Ltd) in the event of divorce. In particular, whether a minority discount should be applied.
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 5 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    In re Howell Enters., Inc.

    Howell Enterprises, Inc., (Howell) and Tradax America, Inc., (Tradax) both sell rice. A customer, Bar Schwartz Limited (Bar Schwartz), wanted to buy some rice and pay for it with a commercial letter of credit. But Bar Schwartz could not buy rice from...
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis