Defendant debtors, three married couples dba H.S.L. Properties, had executed a promissory note and deed of trust in connection with their purchase of the El Dorado Country Club property. The agreements provided that upon payment of an installment of the...

John O’Connor, who was engaged in the business of keeping wagons for hire, employed George Tracy, who had formerly been in business for himself as a piano mover. At this time, O’Connor was having a wagon built, and he directed the builder...

Plaintiff Insurent Agency Corporation ("Insurent") specializes in serving as a guarantor for residential leases. Insurent and its parent company, Plaintiff RS Holdings Corporation ("RS Holdings"), sued Insurent's competitor, Defendant...

Patricia Oja, with her mother and aunt, Sally and Suoma Oja, had left home in Ilwaco the morning of Oct. 16, 1965, to go shopping in Longview. The three, with Patricia driving, were returning on Highway No. 401 in a 1964 Chevrolet in the early evening...

In March 1993, the defendants, Rachel R. Holbrook and Robert W. Holbrook, were married and shared a residence. During this time, Mrs. Holbrook received medical services from the plaintiff, Cheshire Medical Center. Cheshire Medical Center charged her ...

Plaintiff estate filed an action under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, Comp. St. §§ 8657-8665, to recover damages for the death of plaintiff's decedent, captain of a barge owned by defendant railroad company. The suit claimed negligence...

Appellee, after a hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ) who relied upon the post-hearing reports of two physicians whom appellant did not have the opportunity to cross-examine, and review by the Appeals Council, found appellant claimant not...

The driver contended the jury did not reduce the award for future medical expenses to present value.

Plaintiff employee sought review of an order from the Circuit Court which dismissed the employee's intentional infliction of mental distress claims against defendants, co-worker and supervisor, for failure to state a cause of action.

Defendant police officer appealed his conviction from the District Court for violating the civil rights of pretrial detainees by using a stun gun, in violation of 18 U.S.C.S. § 242.