• Swift Canadian Co. v. Banet

    Seller Swift Canadian Company, a Canadian corporation, entered into an agreement with Defendants, Albert Banet, Sali Banet and Abraham L. Perliman, buyers who do business as Keystone Wool Pullers in Philadelphia. By this contract Keystone agreed to purchase...
  • United States v. Microsoft Corp.

    In July 1994, officials at the Department of Justice ("DOJ"), on behalf of the United States, filed suit against Microsoft Corp., charging the company with, among other things, unlawfully maintaining a monopoly in the operating system market...
  • Saenz v. Roe

    Respondents filed suit challenging the durational residency requirements of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, contending that the residency requirements imposed an unconstitutional burden on a certain class of...
  • Grantwood Vill. v. Mo. Pac. R.R. Co.

    The origin of this dispute derives from a letter dated April 6, 1872, in which President Ulysses S. Grant authorized his St. Louis agent, Charles W. Ford, to grant Pacific Railroad Company (Pacific) a right-of-way over his land outside of St. Louis, Missouri...
  • Cooley v. Bd. of Wardens

    Pilots brought writs of error and sought to be exempted from the payment of half-pilotage fees, which they were required to pay pursuant to a state law that required certain ships to either receive a pilot or pay a fee. They contended that the state law...
  • State v. Cooper

    Appellant challenged his convictions for kidnapping and assault with a deadly weapon alleging that the trial court erred by refusing to submit the issue of insanity to the jury. The case was appealed to the Supreme Court of Arizona.
  • Iron Grip Barbell Co. v. USA Sports, Inc.

    Plaintiff patentee appealed from an order that found the key claim of its patent for weight plates used with fitness equipment such as barbells to be invalid as obvious in light of the prior art, and granting summary judgment in favor of defendant competitor...
  • Rogers v. Bd. of Cty. Comm'rs

    Appellant citizen filed a petition that sought to compel appellee county board of commissioners to remove obstructions from a right of way. The District Court denominated the petition as a writ of mandamus, ruled that the writ failed to comply with procedural...
  • Elhady v. Kable

    The Plaintiffs are twenty-three U.S. citizens, none of whom have been formally notified by the Government that they are included in the federal government's Terrorist Screening Database ("TSDB"), referred to colloquially as "the Watchlist...
  • Young v. State

    On September 6, 2009, Young entered a dwelling where the victim was located with the intent to commit an offense therein and that in the course of committing said offense, did make an assault or battery upon the victim, actually possessed a firearm or...