Menu SIGN IN
  • lexisassociatesauthor
    lexisassociatesauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Lexis Associates

    Roberts v. State

    Plaintiff sustained injuries after being bumped into by a blind man who failed to use a cane while walking to the restroom. Since the incident occurred in the lobby of a post office and the blind man operated a concession stand in the building, Plaintiff...
  • lexisassociatesauthor
    lexisassociatesauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Lexis Associates

    Planned Parenthood v. Casey

    A Pennsylvania abortion statute was amended to provide that (1) a woman seeking an abortion is required to give her informed consent prior to the abortion procedure and to be provided, at least 24 hours before the abortion is performed, with certain information...
  • lexisassociatesauthor
    lexisassociatesauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Lexis Associates

    United States v. Algernon Blair, Inc.

    Appellee Algernon Blair, Inc. entered into a contract with the United States for the construction of a naval hospital. Appellee subcontracted Coastal Steel Erectors, Inc. to perform certain steel erection and supply certain equipment in conjunction with...
  • lexisassociatesauthor
    lexisassociatesauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Lexis Associates

    Britton v. Turner

    This is a case for breach of contract for labour. Plaintiff agreed to perform work based on certain declarations in exchange for a hundred and twenty dollar compensation from Defendant. The term of the contract is one year from March 1831 but Plaintiff...
  • lexisassociatesauthor
    lexisassociatesauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Lexis Associates

    Rural Tel. Serv. Co. v. Feist Publ'ns, Inc.

    Plaintiff is a telephone service provider in select areas in northwest Kansas. State regulations require Plaintiff to publish and distribute an annual telephone directory. Aside from its white pages listings, Plaintiff’s directory contain yellow...
  • lexisassociatesauthor
    lexisassociatesauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Lexis Associates

    Mohr v. Williams

    The patient consented to an operation on her right ear. However, during the operation, the surgeon determined that her left ear was in a more serious condition and decided to perform an operation on the left ear only. The patient sued the surgeon for...
  • lexisassociatesauthor
    lexisassociatesauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Lexis Associates

    Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co.

    A couple living 1 mile from an oil refinery, advised the oil company that it created a nuisance in the neighbourhood by polluting the atmosphere and demanded that they forthwith put an end to the atmospheric pollution. The oil company continued its operation...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 1 year ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Lerner Shops v. Marin

    The customer's action sought to recover for her claimed false imprisonment by the retailer for suspicion of shoplifting.
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 1 year ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Austin v. Burge

    The subscriber's father-in-law purchased a subscription to the newspaper for the subscriber for two years. The publisher continued to send the subscriber the newspaper through the mail for several years more. On two occasions, the subscriber paid...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 1 year ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    King v. Whitmer

    Three voters and three Republican nominees to the electoral college in Michigan brought this suit in a bid to overturn the results of the state's 2020 presidential election, alleging violation of Michigan law.
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis