Menu SIGN IN
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 4 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Cinderella Career & Finishing Sch., Inc. v. FTC

    Respondent, the Federal Trade Commission, charged petitioners Cinderella Career College and Finishing Schools, Inc. (hereinafter Cinderella), Stephen Corporation (the corporate entity which operates Cinderella), and Vincent Melzac (the sole owner of the...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 4 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Native Vill. of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corp.

    Native Village of Kivalina and the City of Kivalina (collectively, “appellants”) filed an action against multiple oil, energy, and utility companies (collectively "Energy Producers"), alleging that the massive greenhouse gas emissions...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Legal Insights Blog
    • Thought Leadership

    Accelerating Attorney Efficiencies with Daniel Lewis

    Data Visualization and Integration Accelerate Attorney Efficiency Interview with Daniel Lewis, V.P. Practical Guidance & Analytical Content, LexisNexis It’s Friday afternoon and a client calls about a potential merger, or a partner asks...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Legal Insights Blog
    • Product Features

    Simplicity in a New Era of Legal Research

    A Modern User Experience Drives Speed and Clarity The early days of the ubiquitous internet search were a far cry from the study in simplicity and ease of use that Google, which has been dominant in the space for decades, built its entire business model...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 4 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Obergefell v. Hodges

    Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court of the United States April 28, 2015, Argued 1 ; June 26, 2015, Decided Nos. 14-556, 14-562, 14-571, 14-574 Opinion  [*651]   [**2593]  Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court. The Constitution promises liberty...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 4 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.

    Lessee, Bob Bixler and Ernest Pestana, Inc., et al. (hereinafter, “respondent lessors”) entered into a lease agreement, which provided, among others, that the lessee shall not assign the lease “without written consent of Lessor.”...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    United States v. Corbin

    United States v. Corbin United States District Court for the Southern District of New York October 21, 2010, Decided; October 21, 2010, Filed 09 Cr. 0463 (VM) Opinion  [*609]  DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge . In this action...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    In re United Shore Fin. Servs., LLC

    In re United Shore Fin. Servs., LLC United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit January 3, 2018, Filed No. 17-2290 Opinion ORDER United Shore Financial Services, LLC petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking to compel the district court to vacate...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Certainteed Gypsum NC, Inc. v. Duke Energy Progress, LLC

    Certainteed Gypsum NC, Inc. v. Duke Energy Progress, LLC North Carolina Superior Court, Person County August 28, 2018, Decided 17 CVS 395 Opinion OPINION & FINAL JUDGMENT 1. THIS MATTER came on for trial without a jury before the undersigned commencing...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Weride Corp. v. Kun Huang

    Weride Corp. v. Kun Huang United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division April 16, 2020, Decided; April 24, 2020, Filed Case No. 5:18-cv-07233-EJD Opinion ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS; OVERRULING EVIDENTIARY...
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis