Menu SIGN IN
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    People v. James

    A jury found a woman guilty of three counts of second degree murder, manufacturing methamphetamine, and conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine. The jury expressly based each of the murder verdicts on both implied malice and second degree felony murder...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Morissette v. United States

    The government owned property, which was used as a bombing range, on which private citizens extensively hunted deer despite signs posted stating "keep out." After an unsuccessful hunting trip, petitioner removed spent bomb casings from the property...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 13 years ago
    • Pressroom
    • News

    LexisNexis Launches Social Media Visibility Service for Law Firms

    Social Media Service Now Part of Enhanced Portfolio of Web Visibility Solutions Designed to Help Small Law Firms Engage More Prospective Clients January 31, 2012 — NEW YORK – LexisNexis (www.lexisnexis.com), a leading provider of content and technology...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 17 years ago
    • Pressroom
    • News

    LexisNexis changing face, pace of online legal research with introduction of new “single search” functionality on lexis.com

    New functionality provides legal professionals with results from across multiple sources,all in one place, for faster and more accurate research September 25, 2007 — New York, NY, September 25, 2007 - LexisNexis, a leading provider of information...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    United States v. Container Corp. of Am.

    United States v. Container Corp. of Am. Supreme Court of the United States November 18, 1968, Argued ; January 14, 1969, Decided No. 27 Opinion  [*334]   [***528]   [**511]  MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court. This is a civil antitrust...
  • SUELEADBEATERQ
    SUELEADBEATERQ
    • over 5 years ago
    • LexTalk® UK
    • LexTalk® Family

    Divorce proceedings where Respondent lacks capacity

    My client's wife has dementia and lacks capacity. The parties separated 3 years ago. My client was unable to cope any longer and wife's family stepped in as her carers. They have refused to allow any communication between my client and his wife...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Stoneridge Inv. Partners, LLC v. Sci.-Atlanta, Inc.

    Alleging losses after purchasing Charter Communications, Inc., common stock, investors sued respondent suppliers and customers under S.E.C. Rule 10b-5 , 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 , and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C.S. § 78j(b) ,...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Mosley v. Gen. Motors Corp.

    Plaintiffs Nathaniel Mosley and nine other individuals joined in bringing a suit action, individually and as class representatives, alleging discriminatory employment practices against defendants General Motors Corp. (” General Motors”) and...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Nixon v. United States

    After petitioner Nixon, the Chief Judge of a federal district court, was convicted of federal crimes and sentenced to prison, the House of Representatives adopted articles of impeachment against him and presented them to the Senate. Following proceedings...
  • lexisassociatesauthor
    lexisassociatesauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Lexis Associates

    Perkins v. New Orleans Athletic Club

    Plaintiff filed an action against defendant private club, alleging that the club violated 42 U.S.C.S. § 1981 by refusing to admit him to membership in the club based upon his race. Plaintiff had earlier obtained an injunction against the private...
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis