Menu SIGN IN
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 5 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Vazquez v. Bayer Corp.

    Vazquez v. Bayer Corp. United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania May 15, 2019, Decided; May 15, 2019, Filed Civil Action No. 18-392 Opinion Re: ECF No. 14, 68 MEMORANDUM ORDER Defendants ("Bayer") removed this action...
  • Kimberley
    Kimberley
    • over 5 years ago
    • LexTalk® UK
    • LexTalk® Dispute Resolution

    Interim Payment of Costs

    I have received a interim payment of costs from the other party - can I use this payment to clear an unpaid invoice or do I have to wait until the final determination of costs? i.e. the outcome of detailed assessment.
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 5 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Almendarez-Torres v. United States

    Title 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) makes it a crime for a deported alien to return to the United States without special permission and authorizes a maximum prison term of two years. In 1988, Congress added subsection (b)(2), which authorizes a maximum prison...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 5 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    People v. Guthrie

    At approximately 12:15 a.m. on Sept. 27, 2009, a police officer stopped defendant Rebecca Guthrie's vehicle after observing the vehicle drive past a stop sign without stopping. The stop sign was located at the edge of a supermarket parking lot in...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.

    Perfect 10, Inc. (Perfect 10) markets and sells copyrighted images of nude models. Among other enterprises, it operates a subscription website on the Internet. Subscribers pay a monthly fee to view Perfect 10 images in a "members' area"...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    State ex rel Stoyanoff v. Berkeley

    Stoyanoff sought to build a house that is highly modernistic and unusual in design “but complied with all existing building and zoning regulations and ordinances of the City of Ladue, Missouri”. The Architectural Board examined the application...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 6 years ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Flagg Bros., Inc. v. Brooks

    Plaintiff was evicted from her apartment, and her possessions were stored by defendant in its warehouse. After a series of disputes over the validity of charges claimed by defendant, plaintiff received a letter demanding that her account be brought up...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 1 year ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    In re Ring

    The attorney failed to file an appellate brief, and the client's appeal of his criminal conviction was dismissed. The client filed a complaint with the commission regarding the attorney's misrepresentations. The hearing board found the attorney...
  • Sherica Celine
    Sherica Celine
    • over 2 years ago
    • Legal Insights Blog
    • Practical Guidance

    Ready to Enroll? SECURE 2.0’s Auto-Enrollment Rules for New Plans

    Starting in 2025, mandatory automatic enrollment is the rule for new 401(k) and 403(b) plans, as provided under the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 ( Div. T of Pub. L. No. 117-328 ). The rule applies to plans established after December 28, 2022, which will need...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    United States v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc.

    United States v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc. United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts September 9, 2021, Decided; September 9, 2021, Filed Civil Action No. 20-11548-NMG Opinion  [*416]  MEMORANDUM & ORDER GORTON, J. This case arises...
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis