Not a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Mealeys

Mealey's IP/Tech - No Coverage For Claims Patent Was Fraudulently Procured, Used To Monopolize Market

SAN JOSE, Calif. - A California appeals panel on Jan. 16 affirmed a lower court's ruling that a commercial liability insurer has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against underlying claims that it fraudulently procured a patent from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) and used that particular patent to attempt to monopolize the active dopant metrology market, rejecting the argument that it was objectively reasonable for the insured to expect that the policy's "malicious prosecution" coverage extended to this claim (Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. KLA Tencor Corp., No. H044890, Calif. App., 6th Dist.).
Find full version on lexis Advance®