Quoting Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, a Florida appellate court reversed a trial court’s ruling that a firm was immune from tort liability because the injured party was its “borrowing servant.” The appellate court indicated that there was a presumption that the injured party was not a borrowed servant. Moreover, it was not clear which of two entities contracted for the injured party's services, supervised him, or benefitted from his work. It was also unclear whether the defendant company had the power to control the details of the injured party's work since there was testimony that the injured party was partly supervised by a general employer. The factual issues precluded summary judgment on the issue.
Reported by Thomas A. Robinson, J.D.
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See Suarez v. Transmontaigne Servs., Inc., 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19195 (Dec. 4, 2013) [2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19195 (Dec. 4, 2013)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 67.01 [67.01]
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
Special Discount Price $79*; Books shipping now to customers!
Keep track of how the workers' comp landscape is changing with this 400+ page compendium. Here's what you get:
View the brochure & table of contents.
View sample pages.
Order online or contact Christine Hyatt at ph. 937-247-8166, or Email: Christine.E.Hyatt@lexisnexis.com.
PROMO CODE: WCEIA
*Price does not include sales tax, shipping or handling. Price subject to change without notice. Discount cannot be combined with other offers. Expires 12/31/2013.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site