Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.
LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
By: Channing J. Martin
EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers have promulgated a final rule defining the scope of federal jurisdiction over wetlands and other “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act. Dubbed the “Clean Water Rule” by EPA, the 297-page document was issued to clear up the regulatory uncertainty over the scope of federal jurisdiction resulting from the U.S. Supreme Court’s “significant nexus” 2006 decision in Rapanos v. United States, [subscribers can access an enhanced version of this case: lexis.com | Lexis Advance]. Instead, many are claiming it’s a massive power grab by the federal government that muddies the waters further. The House of Representatives has already voted to block the rule, and the Senate has a bill before it to do the same. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, American Farm Bureau Foundation, and other industry groups have vowed to challenge the rule in court.
So what does the rule do? In a nutshell, it seeks to reduce the number of instances where a case-by-case “significant nexus” analysis is required by better defining what waters are regulated. Among other things, it defines for the first time tributaries that have a significant connection to downsteam waters, and it includes new distance-based metrics for determining the extent to which jurisdiction reaches nearby waters. But critics contend the rule is written so that the greater specificity it provides expands jurisdiction even more. They say that rather than limiting jurisdiction, the use of distance-based metrics makes it possible to extend federal jurisdiction to just about any water anywhere.
The final rule was issued on May 26, 2015, but has not yet been published in the Federal Register. It will be effective 60 days after it has been published. This issue is far from resolved, and a trip back to the U.S. Supreme Court seems inevitable.
About Williams Mullen
With approximately 225 attorneys practicing in over 30 practice areas, Williams Mullen provides comprehensive legal services to regional, national and international clients. Their clients include multinational Fortune 500 companies, private family-owned businesses, nonprofit organizations and government entities. From offices in North Carolina, Virginia, Washington D.C. and London, Williams Mullen attorneys bring skills and experience to solving the legal needs of their diverse client base.
Read more alerts by Williams Mullen attorneys
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions, connect with us through our corporate site