![if gte IE 9]><![endif]><![if gte IE 9]><![endif]><![if gte IE 9]><![endif]><![if gte IE 9]><![endif]><![if gte IE 9]><![endif]>
Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.
LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
Why have some of the largest banks in the world invested large sums of money to environmental and sustainability causes? Why did both Citigroup and Bank of America pledge to invest $50 billion each in alternative energy and conservation projects and – more important – work hard to meet these goals? Why are environmental and sustainability issues important to financial institutions? This appears counterintuitive. After all, banks do not operate factories, use much energy or water, require the use of large quantities of raw materials, or emit much in the way of pollutants into the air or generate much solid waste or wastewater. Why is sustainability now important to financial institutions?Environmental and sustainability issues ranging from climate change to pollution abatement to alternative energy are important to the operations and profits of financial institutions. Banks provide capital to all sectors of the economy for positive growth and results. As environmental and sustainability issues directly affect more businesses, they will similarly impact lending decisions, such as return on investment, risk, and facility and supply chain management.Financial institutions recognize two phases to this issue. Investing in green projects (particularly beating the competition) represents a great business opportunity. Cities and now countries crave greener buildings, smarter energy production and distribution, and cleaner transportation. For example, in China before the last Olympics, non-sustainable growth can be dangerous both healthwise and economically. European nations understand the high cost of energy. Even areas in the US, such as PlaNYC 2030, understand this, too. Those with proven technologies and proper financing will have an advantage (and an opportunity to make money).Ignoring environmental and sustainability issues represents a potential financial risk. The UN Environmental Programme estimated that loss of value of assets due to the impacts of climate change could total $1 trillion annually by 2040. This has got to be a worrisome figure for financial institutions who finance vulnerable assets, as well as for the insurance industry.Therefore these leading institutions are not investing in sustainability for public relations purposes or for charity. It is part of their corporate strategy. There is growing evidence that sustainability efforts correlate well with improved financial performance. A study by AT Kearney (http://www.atkearney.com/news-media/news-releases/) found that financial services providers focused on environmental and sustainability issues during the recent recession outperformed their competitors by 25% in terms of their market capitalization over a 6 month period.CCES has the experience to help your firm develop a new or expand your current sustainability program to result in measureable, deliverable financial benefits for you. See www.CCESworld.com. Contact us at 914-584-6720 or karell@CCESworld.com.
Marc Karell, P.E., CEM, Principal, Climate Change & Environmental Services, LLC
Reprinted with permission by CCES
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site
Alternative energy questions are usually taken into consideration on such pages as EnvironmentGuru, CollegeScience, Greenpeace or buyessays.cheap/write-my-essay-cheap articles for university students. Formally, the new laws and the paper signed by more then 20 countries do have some power. In fact, the paper was a mere reason for bargaining.