Insurance Law

Recent Posts

Excess Carrier Could Not Seek Reimbursement from the Primary Insurer Based On Its Rejection of a Claimant’s Settlement Offer Within Its Primary Limits Because There Was Not a Final Excess Judgment
Posted on 18 Feb 2014 by Troutman Sanders

In RSUI Indemnity Co. v. Discover P&C Insurance Co [ enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers ], the primary insurer issued the insured a commercial automobile liability policy with a $1 million limit per-occurrence and in the aggregate... Read More

SNR Denton on Doherty v. Merchants Mutual Insurance Co.: When Is Bad Faith Failure To Settle a Jury Question in New York?
Posted on 29 Mar 2011 by SNR Denton

By William T. Barker & Justin N. Kattan In Doherty v. Merchants Mutual Insurance Co. , [1] a sharply divided Appellate Division affirmed summary judgment for an insurer on bad faith failure to settle. If followed, this would arguably raise the... Read More

The Eastern District of California Holds That A Carrier May Have An Affirmative Duty To Attempt to Settle A Claim Against The Insured When It Is Presented With A Reasonable Settlement Opportunity
Posted on 8 Apr 2014 by Troutman Sanders

Travelers Indem. of Conn. v. Arch Specialty Ins. Co. , 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169453 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 26, 2013) [ enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers ] In Travelers , the district court concluded that the carrier must act in good faith... Read More

Pillsbury Winthrop: Ninth Circuit Reaffirms that Insurers May be Obligated to Initiate Settlement Discussions Under California Law
Posted on 18 Jun 2012 by LexisNexis Insurance Law Newsroom Staff

By Brian Martin and Nathaniel Smith , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Insurers frequently disclaim any duty to participate in settling a third party claim against their insureds unless and until the third party claimant makes a settlement demand... Read More

Duty to Settle Requires a Willing Plaintiff – No “Bad Faith” Failure to Settle
Posted on 5 Jul 2012 by Barry Zalma

By Barry Zalma, Attorney and Consultant In March I posted an article on the need to put a stake through the heart of the tort of bad faith . The post that follows deals with a case that supports the position I took in that post and makes me wonder... Read More

SNR Denton on Roehl Transport, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.: Wisconsin Recognizes New Form of Bad Faith
Posted on 27 Oct 2010 by William T. Barker

By William T. Barker, Partner, SNR Denton In Roehl Transport, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. , the Wisconsin Supreme Court has recognized a new form of bad faith failure to settle: failing to minimize use of the insured’s deductible... Read More

SNR Denton on Doherty v. Merchants Mutual Insurance Co.: When Is Bad Faith Failure To Settle a Jury Question in New York?
Posted on 29 Mar 2011 by SNR Denton

By William T. Barker & Justin N. Kattan In Doherty v. Merchants Mutual Insurance Co. , [1] a sharply divided Appellate Division affirmed summary judgment for an insurer on bad faith failure to settle. If followed, this would arguably raise the... Read More

Duty to Settle Requires a Willing Plaintiff – No “Bad Faith” Failure to Settle
Posted on 5 Jul 2012 by Barry Zalma

By Barry Zalma, Attorney and Consultant In March I posted an article on the need to put a stake through the heart of the tort of bad faith . The post that follows deals with a case that supports the position I took in that post and makes me wonder... Read More

Pillsbury Winthrop: Ninth Circuit Reaffirms that Insurers May be Obligated to Initiate Settlement Discussions Under California Law
Posted on 18 Jun 2012 by LexisNexis Insurance Law Newsroom Staff

By Brian Martin and Nathaniel Smith , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Insurers frequently disclaim any duty to participate in settling a third party claim against their insureds unless and until the third party claimant makes a settlement demand... Read More

SNR Denton on Butler v. First Acceptance Insurance Co.: Lawyer Cannot Testify as Expert in Bad Faith Case Where Lawyer’s Background Is Not Relevant To Issues in Case
Posted on 23 Jul 2010 by Ronald D. Kent

By Ronald D. Kent, Partner, SNR Denton Butler v. First Acceptance Insurance Co., 652 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (N.D. Ga. 2009), concerns an insurer’s duty to settle. Butler received what his lawyer regarded as an inadequate response to a time-limit... Read More