Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.

Intellectual Property

Top 10 most recent Copyright and Trademark Cases on Lexis.com for the week of November 15th, 2009

1. Lava Records LLC v. Amurao, No. 08-2376-cv, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 25037, November 16, 2009, Decided, PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Lava Records LLC v. Amurao

Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Lava Records LLC v. Amurao

2. Am. Rice, Inc. v. Dunmore Props. S.A., 2009-1313, (Cancellation No. 92/047,008), UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 25467, November 16, 2009, Decided, THIS DECISION WAS ISSUED AS UNPUBLISHED OR NONPRECEDENTIAL AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENT. PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Am. Rice, Inc. v. Dunmore Props. S.A.

Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Am. Rice, Inc. v. Dunmore Props. S.A.

3. Ub Found. Activities, Inc. v. IT Healthtrack, Inc., 04-CV-443S(F), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108109, November 19, 2009, Decided, November 19, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Ub Found. Activities, Inc. v. IT Healthtrack, Inc.

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

4. Architects Collective v. Gardner Tanenbaum Group, L.L.C., NO. CIV-08-1354-D, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107544, November 18, 2009, Decided, November 18, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Architects Collective v. Gardner Tanenbaum Group, L.L.C.

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

5. Perrey v. Televisa, CASE NO. CV 09-06508 FMC (RZx), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107797, November 18, 2009, Decided, November 18, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Perrey v. Televisa

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

6. Armstrong v. Eagle Rock Entm't, Inc., Case Number: 09-CV-11704, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, SOUTHERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107127, November 17, 2009, Decided, November 17, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Armstrong v. Eagle Rock Entm't, Inc.

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

7. Klein v. Rittenband, 09-CV-2019 (ILG), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107811, November 17, 2009, Decided, November 18, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Klein v. Rittenband

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

8. Sims v. Viacom, Inc., CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3521, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107938, November 17, 2009, Decided, November 17, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Sims v. Viacom, Inc.

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

9. Recording v. Nguyen, 1:08cv1065 (LMB/TCB), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA, ALEXANDRIA DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108641, November 17, 2009, Decided, November 17, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Recording v. Nguyen

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

10. Lasco Foods, Inc. v. Hall & Shaw Sales, Mktg. & Consulting LLC, 4:08cv01683 JCH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106848, November 16, 2009, Decided, November 16, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Lasco Foods, Inc. v. Hall & Shaw Sales, Mktg. & Consulting LLC

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

Comment