Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.

Intellectual Property

Top 10 most recent Copyright and Trademark Cases on Lexis.com for the week of October 18th, 2009

1. Ott v. Ingenix, Inc., No. 08-35907, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23436, October 16, 2009 **, Submitted, Seattle, Washington** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)., October 23, 2009, Filed, PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Ott v. Ingenix, Inc

Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Ott v. Ingenix, Inc

2. Isbell v. DM Records Inc. (In re Isbell Records, Inc.), No. 09-40343, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23328, October 22, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Isbell v. DM Records Inc

Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Isbell v. DM Records Inc

3. Ind. State Dist. Council of Laborers v. Omnicare, Inc., No. 07-6379, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, 09a0370p.06;, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23084; 2009 FED App. 0370P (6th Cir.), September 18, 2008, Argued, October 21, 2009, Decided, October 21, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Ind. State Dist. Council of Laborers v. Omnicare, Inc

Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Ind. State Dist. Council of Laborers v. Omnicare, Inc

4. Emplrs Reinsurance Corp. v. Thomson Corp., Nos. 08-1719-cv (Lead); 08-2100-cv (XAP)**** No. 08-2100-cv (XAP) has been closed by stipulation filed December 30, 2008., UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23075, October 19, 2009, Decided, PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Emplrs Reinsurance Corp. v. Thomson Corp

Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Emplrs Reinsurance Corp. v. Thomson Corp

5. Coryn Group II, LLC v. O.C. Seacrets, Inc., CIVIL NO.: WDQ-08-2764, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, NORTHERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98443, October 22, 2009, Decided, October 22, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Coryn Group II, LLC v. O.C. Seacrets, Inc

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

6. Glasscraft Door I, L.P. v. Seybro Door & Weathership Co., CIVIL ACTION H-08-2667, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, HOUSTON DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98091, October 22, 2009, Decided, October 22, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Glasscraft Door I, L.P. v. Seybro Door & Weathership Co

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

7. Beirut Traders Co. v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Case No. 2:09-CV-11176, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, SOUTHERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98149, October 22, 2009, Decided, October 22, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Beirut Traders Co. v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

8. Distor v. US Bank Na, No. C 09-02086 SI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98361, October 22, 2009, Decided, October 22, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Distor v. US Bank Na

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

9. United States v. Approximately $ 24,546.25 in United States Currency Seized from Farmers & Merchs. Bank of Cent. Cal. Account #547155701, 1:09-cv-00284-OWW-SMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98895, October 22, 2009, Decided, October 23, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of United States v. Approximately $ 24,546.25 in United States Currency Seized from Farmers & Merchs. Bank of Cent

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

10. Glasscraft Door I, L.P. v. Seybro Door & Weathership Co., CIVIL ACTION H-08-2667, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, HOUSTON DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98091, October 22, 2009, Decided, October 22, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Glasscraft Door I, L.P. v. Seybro Door & Weathership Co

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

Comment