Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.

Intellectual Property

Top 10 most recent Copyright and Trademark Cases on Lexis.com for the week of October 4th, 2009

1. Cogdill v. Am. Gen. Assur. Co., C.A. No. 3:08-03466-CMC, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA, COLUMBIA DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94235, October 8, 2009, Decided, October 8, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Cogdill v. Am. Gen. Assur. Co.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
2. Banco Popular De P.R. v. Latin Am. Music Co., Civil No. 01-1142 (GAG), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94475, October 8, 2009, Decided, October 9, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Banco Popular De P.R. v. Latin Am. Music Co.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
3. Martindale Corp. v. Heartland Inns of Am., L.L.C., No. 08-CV-2065-LRR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA, EASTERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93566, October 7, 2009, Decided, October 7, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of  Martindale Corp. v. Heartland Inns of Am., L.L.C
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
4. FSC Franchise Co., LLC v. Express Corporate Apparel, LLC, CASE NO: 8:09-cv-454-T-23TGW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92894, October 6, 2009, Decided, October 6, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of FSC Franchise Co., LLC v. Express Corporate Apparel, LLC
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
5. Hileman Enters. of Mich. v. Statewide Claims, Inc., Case No. 2:09-cv-12916, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, SOUTHERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92982, October 6, 2009, Decided, October 6, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Hileman Enters. of Mich. v. Statewide Claims, Inc.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
6. Artemis Mktg. Corp. v. Rooms 2 Go Furniture, Inc., Case No. 09-CV-2413 (FB) (SMG), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93116, October 6, 2009, Decided, October 6, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Artemis Mktg. Corp. v. Rooms 2 Go Furniture, Inc.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
7. Fenwick v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., Case No. 2:09-CV-572 TS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93297, October 6, 2009, Decided, October 6, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Fenwick v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
8. Precision IBC, Inc. v. Hoover Materials Handling Group, Inc., CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-0238-CG-M, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93764, October 6, 2009, Decided, October 6, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Precision IBC, Inc. v. Hoover Materials Handling Group, Inc.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
9. Dittman & Greer, Inc. v. Chromalox, Inc., 3:09-cv-1147 (CFD), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93839, October 6, 2009, Decided, October 6, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Dittman & Greer, Inc. v. Chromalox, Inc.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
10. CB Worldwide, Inc. v. Xena Express, Inc., Case No. 09CV02189 JFW (AJWx), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94225, October 6, 2009, Decided, October 6, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of CB Worldwide, Inc. v. Xena Express, Inc.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.