Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.

Intellectual Property

Top 10 most recent Copyright and Trademark Cases on Lexis.com for the week of September 13th, 2009

1. Art Attacks Ink, LLC v. MGA Enter. Inc., No. 07-56110, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20757, December 9, 2008, Argued and Submitted, Pasadena, California, September 16, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Art Attacks Ink, LLC v. MGA Enter. Inc.
 
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Art Attacks Ink, LLC v. MGA Enter. Inc.
 
 
2. Vita-Mix Corp. v. Basic Holding, Inc., 2008-1479, -1517, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20622, September 16, 2009, Decided
 
The district court erred as a matter of law in finding that a patentee, which claimed an improved consumer food blender, had disclaimed all types of stirring in the prosecution history, which contradicted the court's prior claim construction; there was no contributory infringement under 35 U.S.C.S. § 271(c), however.
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Vita-Mix Corp. v. Basic Holding, Inc.
 
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Vita-Mix Corp. v. Basic Holding, Inc.
 
 
3. Sofco v. Nat'l Bank of Kan. City, Case No. 08-2366-JAR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85842, September 18, 2009, Decided, September 18, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Sofco v. Nat'l Bank of Kan. City
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
 
4. Raven Indus. v. Topcon Positioning Sys., CIV. 07-4154, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA, SOUTHERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85727, September 18, 2009, Decided, September 18, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Raven Indus. v. Topcon Positioning Sys.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
 
5. Marv a Les Air Charters, LLC v. Sea Tow Servs. Int'l, Inc., CASE NO. CV406-148, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, SAVANNAH DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85102, September 17, 2009, Decided, September 17, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Marv a Les Air Charters, LLC v. Sea Tow Servs. Int'l, Inc.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
 
6. Del Webb Cmtys. v. Partington, 2:08-cv-00571-RCJ-GWF, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85616, September 17, 2009, Decided, September 18, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Del Webb Cmtys. v. Partington
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
 
7. Upper Deck Co. v. Konami Mktg., 2:08 -cv-01737-RCJ-GWF, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85645, September 17, 2009, Decided, September 18, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Upper Deck Co. v. Konami Mktg.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
 
8. Controversy Music v. McClellan, Case No. 08-13805, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, SOUTHERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84635, September 17, 2009, Decided, September 17, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Controversy Music v. McClellan
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
 
9. Uhlig, LLC v. Shirley, CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:08-1208-HFF-WMC, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA, GREENVILLE DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85213, September 17, 2009, Decided, September 17, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Uhlig, LLC v. Shirley
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
 
10. SEC v. Merrill Scott & Assocs., Case No. 2:02-CV-39-TC, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85577, September 17, 2009, Decided, September 17, 2009, Filed ., Case No. 2:02-CV-39-TC, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85577, September 17, 2009, Decided, September 17, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of SEC v. Merrill Scott & Assocs.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.