Top 10 most recent Copyright and Trademark Cases on Lexis.com for the week of September 20th, 2009

1. Cincom Sys. v. Novelis Corp., No. 07-4142, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, 09a0346p.06;, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21172; 2009 FED App. 0346P (6th Cir.), September 8, 2008, Argued, September 25, 2009, Decided, September 25, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Cincom Sys. v. Novelis Corp.

Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Cincom Sys. v. Novelis Corp.

2. Koninklijke Philips Elecs v. KXD Tech., Inc., No. 08-16794, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21156, September 16, 2009 **, Submitted, San Francisco, California** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)., September 24, 2009, Filed, PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Koninklijke Philips Elecs v. KXD Tech., Inc.

Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Koninklijke Philips Elecs v. KXD Tech., Inc.

3. Sly Magazine, LLC v. Weider Publs. L.L.C., No. 08-2430-cv, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20964, September 23, 2009, Decided, PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Sly Magazine, LLC v. Weider Publs. L.L.C.

Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Sly Magazine, LLC v. Weider Publs. L.L.C.

4. Transp. Ins. Co. v. Pa. Manufacturers' Ass'n Ins. Co., No. 08-4815, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21126, September 21, 2009, Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a), September 23, 2009, Opinion Filed, NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION UNDER THIRD CIRCUIT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE RULE 5.7. SUCH OPINIONS ARE NOT REGARDED AS PRECEDENTS WHICH BIND THE COURT. PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Transp. Ins. Co. v. Pa. Manufacturers' Ass'n Ins. Co.

Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Transp. Ins. Co. v. Pa. Manufacturers' Ass'n Ins. Co.

5. Transp. Ins. Co. v. Pa. Manufacturers' Ass'n Ins. Co., No. 08-4815, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21126, September 21, 2009, Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a), September 23, 2009, Opinion Filed, NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION UNDER THIRD CIRCUIT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE RULE 5.7. SUCH OPINIONS ARE NOT REGARDED AS PRECEDENTS WHICH BIND THE COURT. PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Transp. Ins. Co. v. Pa. Manufacturers' Ass'n Ins. Co.

Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Transp. Ins. Co. v. Pa. Manufacturers' Ass'n Ins. Co.

6. Basic Research, LLC v. Rath, No. C-09-00942 RMW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87731, September 24, 2009, Decided, September 24, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Basic Research, LLC v. Rath