Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.

Intellectual Property

Top 10 most recent Copyright and Trademark Cases on Lexis.com for the week of September 6th, 2009.

1. Am. Eagle Outfitters v. Lyle & Scott Ltd., No. 08-4807, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20292, May 21, 2009, Argued, September 11, 2009, Opinion Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Am. Eagle Outfitters v. Lyle & Scott Ltd.

Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Am. Eagle Outfitters v. Lyle & Scott Ltd.

2. Lewis v. Rio Grande Sun, No. 09-2122, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20182, September 10, 2009, Filed, PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Lewis v. Rio Grande Sun

Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Lewis v. Rio Grande Sun

3. First Nat'l Bank in Sioux Falls v. First Nat'l Bank S.D., CIV. 06-4101, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA, SOUTHERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82980, September 11, 2009, Decided, September 11, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of First Nat'l Bank in Sioux Falls v. First Nat'l Bank S.D.

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

4. Lapine v. Seinfeld, No. 08 Civ. 128 (LTS)(RLE), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82304, September 10, 2009, Decided, September 10, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Lapine v. Seinfeld

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

5. KEMA, Inc. v. Koperwhats, No. C-09-1587 MMC, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82329, September 10, 2009, Decided, September 10, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of KEMA, Inc. v. Koperwhats

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

6. Rexall Sundown, Inc. v. Perrigo Co., No 07-CV-3397 (JFB)(ETB), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82604, September 10, 2009, Decided, September 10, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Rexall Sundown, Inc. v. Perrigo Co.

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

7. Steven B. Golden Assocs. v. Royal Consumer Prods., CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3890, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82883, September 10, 2009, Decided, September 11, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Steven B. Golden Assocs. v. Royal Consumer Prods.

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

8. N. Am. Clearing v. Brokerage Computer Sys., Case No. 6:07-cv-1503-Orl-19KRS,Case No. 6:08-cv-1567-Orl-19KRS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, ORLANDO DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82961, September 10, 2009, Decided, September 11, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of N. Am. Clearing v. Brokerage Computer Sys.

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

9. Lapine v. Seinfeld, No. 08 Civ. 128 (LTS)(RLE), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82304, September 10, 2009, Decided, September 10, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Lapine v. Seinfeld

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

10. KEMA, Inc. v. Koperwhats, No. C-09-1587 MMC, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82329, September 10, 2009, Decided, September 10, 2009, Filed

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of KEMA, Inc. v. Koperwhats

Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

Comment