Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.

Intellectual Property

Top 10 most recent Trademark and Copyright cases on lexis.com for the week of 8/16/2009.

1.   Arista Records, LLC v. Launch Media, Inc., Docket No. 07-2576-cv, UNITEDSTATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 18843, March 17, 2009, Argued, August 21, 2009, Decided
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Arista Records, LLC v. Launch Media, Inc.
 
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Arista Records, LLC v. Launch Media, Inc.
 
2.   Arista Records, LLC v. Launch Media, Inc., No. 08-1967-cv, UNITED STATESCOURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 18830, August 21, 2009, Decided, PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS., Decision reached on appeal by Arista Records, LLC v. Launch Media, Inc., 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 18843 (2d Cir. N.Y., Aug. 21, 2009)
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Arista Records, LLC v. Launch Media, Inc.

Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Arista Records, LLC v. Launch Media, Inc.
 
 
3.   United Transp. Union Local 1745 v. City of Albuquerque, No. 08-2103, UNITEDSTATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 18881, August 21, 2009, Filed, PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of United Transp. Union Local 1745 v. City of Albuquerque.
 
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of  United Transp. Union Local 1745 v. City of Albuquerque.
 
 
4.   Parks v. ABC, Inc., No. 08-2514-cv, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FORTHE SECOND CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 18301, August 17, 2009, Decided, PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Parks v. ABC, Inc.

Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Parks v. ABC, Inc.
 
 
5.   Van Cleef & Arpels v. Tenn Angel,CASE NO. 08-80688-CIV-ZLOCH, UNITEDSTATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74362, August 21, 2009, Decided, August 21, 2009, Entered
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Van Cleef & Arpels v. Tenn Angel.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
 
6.   Scholz Design v. Christopher & Karen Skatell,09cv0896, UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74332, August 20, 2009, Decided, August 20, 2009, Filed.
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Scholz Design v. Christopher & Karen Skatell.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
 
7.   Minority TV Project Inc. v. FCC,No. C-06-02699 EDL, UNITED STATES DISTRICTCOURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73324, August 19, 2009, Decided, August 19, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Minority TV Project Inc. v. FCC.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
 
8.   Steele v. Turner Broad. Sys.,Civil Action No. 08-11727-NMG, UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74215, August 19, 2009, Decided
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Steele v. Turner Broad. Sys.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
 
9.    Harris v. Simon & Schuster, Inc., 08 Civ. 3477, UNITED STATES DISTRICTCOURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72842, August 18, 2009, Decided, August 18, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Harris v. Simon & Schuster, Inc.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
 
10.   Redbox Automated Retail LLC v. Universal City Studios LLLP,Civil No. 08-766(RBK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72700, August 17, 2009, Decided, August 17, 2009, Filed, NOT FOR PUBLICATION
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Redbox Automated Retail LLC v. Universal City Studios LLLP.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+