Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.
LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
1. Office Depot, Inc. v. Zuccarini, No. 07-16788, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 4052, July 17, 2009, Argued and Submitted, San Francisco, California, February 26, 2010, Filed
CORE TERMS: domain, registry, registrar, receiver, com, registered, levy, appointment of a receiver, rem jurisdiction, writ of execution ...
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Office Depot, Inc. v. Zuccarini
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne's Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Office Depot, Inc. v. Zuccarini
2. B.A. Constr. & Mgmt. v. Knight Enters., Nos. 07-1491, 08-1581, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, 10a0102n.06;, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 3109; 2010 FED App. 0102N (6th Cir.), February 17, 2010, Filed, NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION. SIXTH CIRCUIT RULE 28 LIMITS CITATION TO SPECIFIC SITUATIONS. PLEASE SEE RULE 28 BEFORE CITING IN A PROCEEDING IN A COURT IN THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. IF CITED, A COPY MUST BE SERVED ON OTHER PARTIES AND THE COURT. THIS NOTICE IS TO BE PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED IF THIS DECISION IS REPRODUCED.
CORE TERMS: fuel, signing bonus, gallon, summary judgment, exemplary damages, attorneys' fees, retail outlet, condition precedent, gasoline, dealer ...
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of B.A. Constr. & Mgmt. v. Knight Enters.
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne's Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of B.A. Constr. & Mgmt. v. Knight Enters.
3. In re Mi Pueblo San Jose, Inc., 2009-1360, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 3029, February 17, 2010, Decided, DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of In re Mi Pueblo San Jose, Inc.
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne's Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of In re Mi Pueblo San Jose, Inc.
4. Larin Corp. v. Mueller, No. 08-55625, No. 08-55790, No. 08-56191, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 2462, December 9, 2009, Argued and Submitted, Pasadena, California, February 5, 2010, Filed, PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.
CORE TERMS: trade dress, infringement, false advertising, discovery, judicial estoppel, summary judgment, pretrial, attorneys' fees, packaging, stools ...
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Larin Corp. v. Mueller
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne's Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Larin Corp. v. Mueller
5. SEB S.A. v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 2009-1099, 2009-1108, 2009-1119, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 2454, February 5, 2010, Decided
CORE TERMS: deep fryer, skirt, patent, infringement, pan, ring, plastic, inducement, temperature, modified ...
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of SEB S.A. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne's Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of SEB S.A. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
6. Stoller v. Best Data Prods., 2010-1031, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 4354, February 5, 2010, Decided, February 5, 2010, Filed, THIS DECISION WAS ISSUED AS UNPUBLISHED OR NONPRECEDENTIAL AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENT. PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Stoller v. Best Data Prods.
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne's Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Stoller v. Best Data Prods.
7. Pac. Sunwear of Cal., Inc. v. Kira Plastinina Style, Ltd., No. 09-55699, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 2137, December 7, 2009, Argued and Submitted, Pasadena, California, February 1, 2010, Filed, PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.
CORE TERMS: trademark, preliminary injunction, injunction, enjoining, legal standard, nontrademark
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Pac. Sunwear of Cal., Inc. v. Kira Plastinina Style, Ltd.
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne's Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Pac. Sunwear of Cal., Inc. v. Kira Plastinina Style, Ltd.
8. Career Agents Network, Inc. v. careeragentsnetwork.biz, Case No. 09-CV-12269-DT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, SOUTHERN DIVISION, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17263, February 26, 2010, Decided, February 26, 2010, Filed
CORE TERMS: domain, website, trademark, site, Lanham Act, bad faith, internet, recruiting, summary judgment, consumer ...
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Career Agents Network, Inc. v. careeragentsnetwork.biz
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne's Research Value Package.
9. Montblanc-Simplo GMBH v. Colibri Corp., 07-CV-5422 (KAM)(RLM), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17378, February 26, 2010, Decided, February 26, 2010, Filed
CORE TERMS: recommendations, clear error, trade dress, injunction, modified, watches
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Montblanc-Simplo GMBH v. Colibri Corp.
10. Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Freestar Bank, N.A., Case No. 08-1278, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17494, February 26, 2010, Decided, February 26, 2010, Filed
CORE TERMS: attorney's fees, infringement, discovery, good faith, oppressive, lawsuit, abuse of process, unreasonably, deliberate, registered ...
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Freestar Bank, N.A.
1. Hofmann v. O'Brien, No. 09-1408, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 4070, January 27, 2010, Submitted, February 26, 2010, Decided, PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.
CORE TERMS: infringement, photograph, painting, actual damages, compensatory damages, new trial, non-economic, market value, jury instructions, economic damages ...
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Hofmann v. O'Brien
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne's Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Hofmann v. O'Brien
2. Maverick Recording Co. v. Harper, No. 08-51194, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 3912, February 25, 2010, Filed
CORE TERMS: audio, innocent, infringer, infringement, downloaded, infringed, summary judgment, statutory damages, file-sharing, music ...
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Maverick Recording Co. v. Harper
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne's Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Maverick Recording Co. v. Harper
3. Gaylord v. United States, 2009-5044, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 3915, February 25, 2010, Decided
CORE TERMS: stamp, memorial, fair use, soldier, photograph, copyrighted, sculpture, veteran, authorship, transformative ...
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Gaylord v. United States
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne's Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Gaylord v. United States
4. Utopia Provider Sys. v. Pro-Med Clinical Sys., L.L.C., Nos. 09-11160, 09-11447, 09-12887, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 3280, February 19, 2010, Decided, February 19, 2010, Filed
CORE TERMS: template, convey information, license agreement, blank, patient, copyrightable, contract claims, law claims, supplemental jurisdiction, royalty ...
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Utopia Provider Sys. v. Pro-Med Clinical Sys.
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne's Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Utopia Provider Sys. v. Pro-Med Clinical Sys.
5. Kleinman v. City of San Marcos, No. 08-50960, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 2761, February 10, 2010, Filed
CORE TERMS: ordinance, junked, car-planter, expressive, planet, municipal, planter, intermediate, display, visible ...
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Kleinman v. City of San Marcos
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne's Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Kleinman v. City of San Marcos
6. Siler v. United States, 2009-5130, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 2167, February 2, 2010, Decided, THIS DECISION WAS ISSUED AS UNPUBLISHED OR NONPRECEDENTIAL AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENT. PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Siler v. United States
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne's Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Siler v. United States
7. Nova Design Build, Inc. v. Grace Hotels, LLC, No. 08 C 2855, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17441, February 26, 2010, Decided, February 26, 2010, Filed
CORE TERMS: drawings, summary judgment, reconstruction, counterclaim, deposit, copyright infringement, law claims, original works, deposit copy, registration ...
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Nova Design Build, Inc. v. Grace Hotels, LLC
8. Johnson v. Hill, No. 08 C 7264, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18354, February 26, 2010, Decided, February 26, 2010, Filed
CORE TERMS: summary judgment, res judicata, claim preclusion, final judgment, discovery, song, state-law, statute of limitations, copyright infringement, infringement ...
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Johnson v. Hill
9. Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., Case Number C 07-3783 JF, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16899, February 25, 2010, Decided, February 25, 2010, Filed
CORE TERMS: misrepresentation, bad faith, video, affirmative defenses, unclean hands, notice, takedown, provider's, viewing, summary judgment ...
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Lenz v. Universal Music Corp.
10. Microcheck Sys., Inc. v. Nunez, CIVIL ACTION NO. H-09-3567, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, HOUSTON DIVISION, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16483, February 24, 2010, Decided, February 24, 2010, Filed
CORE TERMS: registration, Copyright Act, copyright infringement, subject matter jurisdiction, state law claims, infringement, technology, misappropriated, supplemental, proprietary ...
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Microcheck Sys., Inc. v. Nunez