![if gte IE 9]><![endif]><![if gte IE 9]><![endif]><![if gte IE 9]><![endif]><![if gte IE 9]><![endif]><![if gte IE 9]><![endif]>
Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.
LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
On March 25, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Quality Stores, Inc., 572 U.S. ___ (2014), No. 12-1408 [an enhanced version of this opinion is available to lexis.com subscribers], that severance payments made to employees involuntarily terminated in connection with Quality Stores’ Chapter 11 bankruptcy were taxable wages for purposes of the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA). A bankruptcy court, a district court and a court of appeals had held to the contrary. Thus, in an opinion by Justice Kennedy, joined in by all other Justices but Kagan who recused herself, the Court reversed the court of appeals, finding that FICA’s definition of “wages” was stated broadly as “all remuneration for employment.” The Court noted that the severance payments at issue “were varied based on job seniority and time served, and were not linked to” state unemployment benefits. They were a part of the employer-employee relationship for which compensation was paid. The Court also stated that the lengthy list of exemptions from the definition of wages included severance payments “because of … retirement for disability.” There was no explicit exemption for the severance payments at issue here.
FICA’s statutory history also supported the Court’s holding in this case.
Finally, the Court stated that the major principle of Rowan Cos. v. United States, 452 U. S. 247 (1981) [enhanced version], that simplicity of administration and consistency of statutory interpretation instruct that the meaning of “wages” should be in general the same for income-tax withholding and for FICA calculations, also supported its decision.
Read about additional Labor and Employment Law Developments by Edwin S. Hopson in the Wyatt Employment Law Report.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.