Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.
LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
Thursday, May 3, 2012
To view the full text of these opinions, please visit:http://email.lexisnexismail.com/cgi-bin8/DM/t/hpAb0Ggrcd0FuK0kbU0EPor Lexis subscribers may use the links below to access the cases on Lexis.com
The Supreme Court of Washington filed 5 new opinions and Division Three of the Court of Appeals filed 2 new published opinions on Thursday, May 3, 2012: Supreme Court:1. Estate of Bunch v. McGraw Residential CenterNo. 85679-6(May 3, 2012)2012 Wash. LEXIS 365Areas: PERSONAL INJURY AND INSURANCE LAWBrief: A cause of action for the injury or death of a minor child is not limited to parents who provided support at the time of the injury or death; it is enough that the parent has, in the past, regularly contributed to the child's support. Because the undisputed facts demonstrated that the deceased child’s adoptive mother had regularly contributed to the child’s support, the trial court erred by denying the adoptive mother's motion to intervene as a necessary party under CR 19(a).2. Minnick v. Clearwire, US, LLCNo. 85810-1(May 3, 2012) 2012 Wash. LEXIS 366Areas: BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL LAWBrief: The early termination fee in the fixed-term telecommunications contracts constituted alternative performance provisions and not liquidated damages clauses.3. State v. Abdulle84660-0(May 3, 2012)2012 Wash. LEXIS 367Areas: CRIMINAL LAWBrief: The defendant's statements were not inadmissible at trial merely because the State failed, without explanation, to call a second officer to corroborate the defendant’s waiver of the rights expressed in the Miranda warnings. A court is, however, free to draw a negative inference from the second officer's absence, but is not required to do so.4. State v. BoydNo. 86709-7(May 3, 2012)2012 Wash. LEXIS 364Areas: CRIMINAL LAWBrief: The defendant was sentenced after RCW 9.94A.701(9) became effective on July 26, 2009. Thus, the trial court, not the Department of Corrections, was required to reduce the defendant's term of community custody to avoid a sentence in excess of the statutory maximum. The trial court erred by imposing a total term of confinement and community custody in excess of the statutory maximum, notwithstanding the Brooks notation.5. State v. McCuistionNo. 81644-1(May 3, 2012)2012 Wash. LEXIS 368Areas: CRIMINAL LAWBrief: The sex offender under commitment as a sexually violent predator had neither a statutory nor a constitutional right to an evidentiary hearing on his continued confinement because he did not present prima facie evidence that his condition had changed such that he no longer met the criteria for confinement. In addition, the statutory amendments challenged by the offender do not violate procedural and substantive due process of law and do not violate separation of powers principles.Court of Appeals:1. State v. SinghNo. 29783-7(May 3, 2012)2012 Wash. App. LEXIS 1028Areas: CRIMINAL LAWBrief: Independent witnesses are not required to convict a defendant of perjury if the crime is recorded and the recording is played at trial.2. Department of Ecology v. City of Spokane ValleyNo. 29675-0(May 3, 2012)2012 Wash. App. LEXIS 1030Areas: GOVERNMENT RELATIONS AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAWPROPERTY AND LAND USE LAWBrief: The owner-used single dock exception to “substantial development” under the Shorelines Management Act applies only when the owner, lessee, or contract purchaser requests the permit in order to undertake construction for its own noncommercial use.
Tell a Friend About Washington Heads Up -Pass along this HeadsUp Alert to your colleagues. They can register online to receive the next headsup directly from LexisNexis.
To stop receiving this communication, use this link.
For questions or comments, please write: HeadsUp@lexisnexis.com HeadsUp is brought to you by LexisNexis®
Privacy Copyright © 2006 LexisNexis®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.LexisNexis, 9443 Springboro Pike, Miamisburg, Ohio 45342