![if gte IE 9]><![endif]><![if gte IE 9]><![endif]><![if gte IE 9]><![endif]><![if gte IE 9]><![endif]><![if gte IE 9]><![endif]>
Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.
LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
By Stephanie Stroup (US)
Last week, Magistrate Judge Beeler in the Northern District of California certified a class of purchasers of cosmetics marketed as “organic” by The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
In so doing, Judge Beeler weighed in on several hot spot issues for class certification, including ascertainability, consumer reliance and class-wide damages models. Her determinations seem generally in keeping with the plaintiff-happy class action climate in California, as courts recently seem reticent to deny class certification.
On June 22, 2011, plaintiffs Rosminah Brown and Eric Lohela filed a lawsuit alleging that several different Avalon Organics and Jason cosmetic products (manufactured and marketed by Hain) were falsely advertised, marketed, and sold as organic. The complaint relies heavily on the California Organic Products Act of 2003, which requires cosmetics to be made of at least 70% organic ingredients in order to be marketed as “Organic.”
Plaintiffs claimed that substantially less than 70 percent of the ingredients of several cosmetic products purchased in 2009 from both lines were certified organic, and filed suit.
Click here to read the entire post.
For more cutting edge commentary on developing issues, visit Norton Rose Fulbright’s Consumer Products Law Blog.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions, connect with us through our corporate site.