Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.
LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
GM bill is likely to be introduced in US Senate. The industry-backed Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act, [subscribers can access an enhanced version of this bill: lexis.com | Lexis Advance], which would prohibit individual states from setting standards for the labeling of foods made from genetically modified organisms, may be introduced in the US Senate soon. The bill passed the House of Representatives in the summer, and its GOP supporters had originally wanted to introduce it in the Senate only if it had a Democratic sponsor. Now, according to a September 30 Politico article, the measure could be introduced as early as October, with only Republican co-sponsors. Chuck Conner, president of the National Council of Farming Cooperatives and a supporter of the act, said he was told the bill would be introduced this month after a Senate Agriculture Committee hearing. “From our standpoint, we’ve got a pretty good shot” at getting it passed, thanks in large part to the GOP majority, Conner said.
Appeals court hears case on Vermont GM statute. On October 8, oral argument was held in New York at the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on an appeal filed by a group of trade associations representing food producers that are opposing Vermont’s GM food labelling law. The law requires labeling of such foods and prohibits manufacturers from describing them as “natural.” In April, a US district judge, [subscribers can access an enhanced version of this opinion: lexis.com | Lexis Advance], rejected the associations’ challenge to the statute, denying a preliminary injunction against its enforcement. It found that the groups were not likely to prevail on the merits of their claims or could not establish irreparable harm. The statute is set to take effect on July 1, 2016. See our earlier coverage of this case.
This regular publication by DLA Piper lawyers Stefanie Jill Fogel, Kathleen Smith Ruhland, and Maggie Craig focuses on helping clients navigate the ever-changing business, legal and regulatory landscape.
Read more about food and beverage law in Food and Beverage News and Trends.
This information is intended as a general overview and discussion of the subjects dealt with. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. DLA Piper is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.
Copyright © 2015 DLA Piper. All rights reserved.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions, connect with us through our corporate site
I comprehend cash perhaps one variable and potentially paid broadcast appointment. Individuals have a privilege to differ and deny him out of their own decision additionally I get it. In the event that cash and the friend network decides the following president then is the USA actually a majority rule government or does media settle on our decisions for us? - See more at: http://123essay.org/
This is so much to say for this website food and you have sorted things well in order in your post. http://pokemongohacker.net/
I visited several pokemon go web pages but the audio feature for audio songs existing at this web site is actually wonderful. http://pokemongozoner.com/
I visited several web pages but the audio feature for audio songs existing at this web site is actually wonderful http://madden-mobile-hacks.com .
Thank you for this wonderful Article! https://fivescarynights.com five nights at freddy's