Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.
LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
By Michael C. Murphy
Citing a recently decided case in Colorado, the bankruptcy trustee for Norse Energy filed a motion in early August urging the New York Court of Appeals to re-hear arguments in the case, [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]. In June, the Court of Appeals issued an opinion which affirmed local zoning laws adopted by two upstate towns that prohibited oil- and gas-related activities within their borders. The motion filed by the trustee in August asserted that a Colorado court’s rationale in striking down a voter-approved local law prohibiting hydraulic fracturing provides support for the position that municipal-wide drilling bans directly conflict with New York’s Oil, Gas and Solution Mining Law. In response, the environmental group Earthjustice recently filed a motion urging the Court of Appeals to reject the trustee’s request on the grounds that the motion for reargument was untimely and the Colorado decision was based on different laws and legal analyses.
Copyright 2014 • Babst, Calland, Clements and Zomnir, P.C. • Two Gateway Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15222 • 412-394-5400 • ShaleEnergyLawBlog.com is publicly distributed by Babst, Calland, Clements and Zomnir, P.C., for the general information of its readers. It is not designed to be, nor should it be considered or used as, the sole source of analyzing and resolving legal problems and matters and is not intendde to give legal advice. If you have, or think you may have, a legal problem or issue relating to any of the matters discussed in the ShaleEnergyLawBlog.com, consult legal counsel.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions, connect with us through our corporate site