Legal NewsRoom
Menu
Menu
LEGAL NEWS
HOT TOPICS
LexisNexis® Legal Newsroom
ACA and Healthcare Reform
Antitrust and Unfair Competition
Banking and Finance
Bankruptcy
California
Climate Change
Constitutional Law and Civil Rights
Consumer Protection & Privacy
Contracts and Commercial Law
Corporate
Criminal Law and Procedure
Energy
Environmental
Estate and Elder Law
Family Law
Financial Fraud Law
Florida
Fracking and Alternative Energy
Health Care
Hot Topics
Hurricane Sandy
Illinois
Immigration Law
Immigration Reform
Insurance Law
Intellectual Property
International Law
International Trade
Labor and Employment Law
Law360
Legal Business
Lexis® Hub
Litigation
Mealeys
Media and Entertainment
Mergers and Acquisitions
New Jersey
New York
Pennsylvania
Public Contracts
Public media
Public Policy
Real Estate Law
Securities
Sports Law
Tax Law
Technology
Texas
Top Emerging Trends
Torts
Virtual Currency
Workers' Compensation
NEWS & INSIGHT
Blogs and Newsletters
BIZ Blog
Blog Mosaic
Business of Law Blog
Corporate Law Advisory
Legal Content Insider
LexTalk
State Net
®
Capitol Journal
News & Trending Topics
Law360
Legal Insights & Trends
Lexis Practice Advisor Journal
Professional Communities
Business Insight Solutions – Partner Portal
Corporate InfoPro (Corporate Information Professionals)
InfoPro (Legal Information Professionals)
LexisNexis
®
for Developers
Litigators Verdict & Settlement Exchange
VISIT LEXISNEXIS LEGAL & PROFESSIONAL
Search
Search
Please enter a Keyword
This should not be used for legal research but instead can be used to find solutions that will help you do legal research.
Sign In
Browse By Tags
AstraZeneca
average price differential
Boston
class actions
class certification
Comcast
Dr. Meredith Rosenthal
health
In re: Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litigation
In re: Rail Freight Fuel
Inc. v. Bouaphakeo
Litigation
Massachusetts
New Jersey
predominance
Reference Manual On Scientific Evidence
Rule 23
Seventh Circuit
Supreme Court
Terri S. Reiskin
toxic tort litigation
Wal-Mart
webinar
Wellbutrin
William A. Ruskin
William A. Ruskin
over 8 years ago
Litigation
Litigation Blog
William A. Ruskin: Comcast Corp. v. Behrend's Impact In Toxic Tort Litigation
By William A. Ruskin I have written about how the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Comcast v. Behrend has had the practical result of raising the bar for class certification and leveling the playing field for corporate defendants [ enhanced opinion...
Ballard Spahr LLP
over 7 years ago
Litigation
Litigation Blog
Ballard Spahr LLP: 3rd Circuit Clarifies Article III Standing For Absent Class Members, Impact Of Comcast
By Burt Rublin, Michael Carroll, and Casey Watkins In a case of first impression in the Third Circuit, the Court of Appeals held that unnamed, putative class members are not required to establish standing under Article III of the U.S. Constitution...
William A. Ruskin
over 9 years ago
Litigation
Litigation Blog
William A. Ruskin: After Comcast v. Behrend: What's Next?
By William A. Ruskin How have courts interpreted, utilized and/or limited the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling last term in Comcast v. Behrend? In a webinar presented by the International Association of Defense Counsel on Wednesday, December 11, 2013...
William A. Ruskin
over 9 years ago
Litigation
Litigation Blog
William A. Ruskin: Comcast May Be A Class Action Game-Changer, But Not In Boston
By William A. Ruskin | In Comcast Corp. v Behrend , 133 S.Ct. 1426 (March 27, 2013) [ enhanced opinion available to lexis.com subscribers ], the Supreme Court held that the lower court erred in failing to consider flaws in plaintiffs' damages model...