Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.
LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
In Connecticut, where less than four months ago Adam Lanza fired 154 shots in four minutes from a Bushmaster AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, killing 26 children and teachers at Sandy Hook Elementary School, lawmakers passed and Gov. Dannel Malloy (D) signed what some called the most comprehensive gun control measure in the nation. The measure (SB 1160), drafted over the last month by a bipartisan group of legislative leaders, among other things bans the sale of magazines carrying 10 or more bullets, expands the state's existing ban on assault weapons, mandates background checks on all firearms purchasers and establishes a registry of weapons offenders. Gun owners and manufacturers, who had packed the Capitol carrying signs that said "Connecticut the Un-Constitution State," "N.R.A. Stand and Fight" and "Shall Not Be Infringed," said the legislation focused on the wrong issues. "It's a mental health issue, not a firearms issue," said Jake McGuigan, director of government relations for the National Shooting Sports Foundation, based in Newtown. "Nothing in this legislation would have stopped what happened in this horrible tragedy in Sandy Hook." The legislation includes mental health provisions, such as the creation of a program to help teachers recognize signs of mental illness, but Sen. Donald E. Williams Jr. (D) said mental health isn't the only issue involved in mass shootings. "It's access to the weapons of war, the access to the weapons that can kill mass amounts of children or adults in our schools and in our communities," he said. "That's the essential issue when it comes to mass killings." In general, however, lawmakers were deeply divided on the issue. Two of the 22 Democrats in the Senate and 13 of the 98 Democrats in the House voted against the bill, and six of the 14 Republicans in the Senate and 20 of the 51 Republicans in the House voted for it. Sen. Catherine Osten, one of the Democrats who cast a no vote, said: "I also cried when those children died that day, as everyone here did, and if I could assure those parents that this legislation would stop that from happening again, I would vote yes." (NEW YORK TIMES, STATE NET)
The above article is provided by the State Net Capitol Journal. State Net is the nation's leading source of state legislative and regulatory content for all states within the United States. State Net daily monitors every bill in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and the United States Congress - as well as every state agency regulation. Virtually all of the information about individual bills and their progress through legislatures is online within 24 hours of public availability.
To subscribe to the Capitol Journal and access archived issue go to the State Net Capitol Journal
If you are a lexis.com subscriber, you can access State Net Bill Tracking, State Net Full Text of Bills, or State Net Regulatory Text. If you are interested in learning more about State Net, contact us.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.