Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.
LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
A police officer, outside his jurisdiction, and on a personal day trip near the Rio Grande, who drowned while undertaking the rescue of a drowning child, sustained fatal injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment, held a New Mexico appellate court recently. Citing Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the court stressed that given the unique expectation placed upon police officers to officially act while off-duty in some circumstances, any emergency action that an on-duty police officer would take in the course of his or her employment that was taken by an off-duty police officer could be considered reasonably incidental to the off-duty officer’s employment responsibilities. Since rendering assistance to a child in danger of drowning was among those risks faced by an on-duty officer, it was reasonable to conclude that the deceased police officer, though off-duty, died in the course and scope of his employment, in spite of his off-duty status at the time.
Reported by Thomas A. Robinson, J.D.
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See Schultz v. Pojoaque Tribal Police Dep’t, 2013 N.M. App. LEXIS 77 (Aug. 19, 2013) [2013 N.M. App. LEXIS 77 (Aug. 19, 2013)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 28.01 [28.01]
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site