LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
It is often said that just as the “instantaneous nature of an observed causal progression is a familiar element in cases dispensing with medical testimony, so a delay between the accident and the symptoms, disability or death diminishes any such self-evident causal relation [Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 128.05]. Accordingly, an Ohio appellate court recently affirmed a trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of an employer where the only available medical evidence was in the form of office notes by a treating physician who did not see the injured worker until more than a month following the alleged incident and the notes did not speak to a causal connection between the injury and the work.
Reported by Thomas A. Robinson, J.D.
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See Jimmison v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth., 2013 Ohio 3155, 2013 Ohio App. LEXIS 3202 (July 18, 2013) [2013 Ohio App. LEXIS 3202 (July 18, 2013)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 128.05 [128.05]
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site